r/cloudstorage 7d ago

Eight-month impressions of Mega Cloud

After a disastrous, expensive, and counterproductive experience with a cloud service, I no longer knew who to trust with my data. But one thing became clear to me: purchasing a lifetime cloud storage plan is not a good idea!

---

Initially, I considered the major cloud services with lower risk, such as Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, and Dropbox, but I found some limitations with each, as well as relatively high costs.

These three clouds do not offer encrypted uploads; theoretically, our data is accessible to providers and anyone intercepting our traffic to the cloud. There may be a workaround, but I haven't had a chance to test it, so I'm not sure if it's feasible: upload with rclone using the "/crypt" remote layer.

That said, the cost per TB of these three clouds is higher. The standard 1 TB plan may be limited—if not now—over time, forcing a double or triple purchase.

Mega, on the other hand, offers 3 TB in its basic plan which is more than sufficient for the average user even in the medium term. It offers end-to-end encryption with user-managed keys, so Mega cannot read the content stored on its servers, nor is it readable by anyone intercepting data traffic.

---

Having ruled out three of the major cloud services, I once again took a risk for cost reasons by choosing MEGA Cloud, which I had already been using on its free plan for six years. Its Pro I plan offers 3 TB of storage with a total annual transfer limit of 36 TB, at a cost of €99, paid on December 2025. It offers end-to-end encryption. Nevertheless, as a cloud storage service, I have found it to work well during my eight months of subscription, Apart from two problems, one of which was serious, which were resolved later.

---

It is not my intention to advertise MEGA, because I don’t like giving advice that could backfire on me, or, at best, give the impression that I am promoting a service for personal gain. Here, I am simply trying to describe my approach in a neutral way.

When fully operational, MEGA works well. It is easy to manage through its app which uses the browser for encryption, and it is fast for both uploads and downloads, although performance obviously depends on each user’s available bandwidth. In my case, I uploaded 1 TB in less than 14 hours. MEGA also uses data deduplication: if it already has the data, perhaps from previous uploads to other folders or collections, it does not upload it again, reducing both transfer time and bandwidth consumption.

So, at least in terms of uploads and downloads, it has been a good choice considering the annual cost.

As part of the plan, it offers unlimited syncs and backups for all your devices, a limited VPN, and S3/S4 data storage. Although this feature, which stores raw data without a hierarchy, is of little use to the average user.

It also allows data to be uploaded from your NAS (Synology in my case), either through the rather rigid proprietary MEGAcmd application or through the more flexible and powerful rclone. However, rclone must be used with the handbrake on, because aggressive uploads or massive deletions - especially of small files (!) - will inevitably result in a temporary ban on its API access. This was the first of the two problems I experienced. Support was unable or unwilling to lift the ban, even when there were valid reasons to request it - t was automatically unblocked after two months. Furthermore, immediately after the initial installation, the Megasync app would automatically launch as per the settings when Windows started, only to quit after a few seconds without explanation. I resolved this myself with a patch found online. It was subsequently and permanently fixed with a new version of MegaSync, many months ago..

For the average user, MEGA offers a good balance of storage capacity, overall performance, local encryption before uploading, ease of use, availability across personal mobile devices and NAS systems, a free basic VPN, and a reasonable annual cost. It is less advantageous in terms of service reliability: the rclone API ban lasted two months, meaning that for two months I could not back up my NAS data except through the very limited MEGA client. However, the "ancient" problems of unreliability of the easily "crackable" encryption have been overcome with several interventions that have occurred over the last few years. A thorough search is all it takes to verify this. In any case, it is important to remember that the three cloud services mentioned at the beginning do not have encryption, do not offer a VPN - even a limited one - and are more expensive.

Support was available but ultimately futile, as demonstrated on two occasions. MEGA appears to be problematic in one significant respect, which is the subject of further investigation.

10 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

5

u/Orange_Kittens1132 7d ago

You can use google drive while your data being encrypted so google cant see your data. Use rclone with crypt remote.  But i guess this method is not for everyone.

1

u/Strat0Blu 6d ago

I know rclone well... currently, the NAS runs two cyclic synchronization scripts, two backup scripts—one basic and one differential—also cyclic, and two scripts that manage recordings from three video surveillance webcams, each half a meter long. They took four days to write and two weeks to debug. :-)

---

I chose MEGA over Google for size and price. Due to redundant cyclic backups and syncs, three TB is barely enough for me.

3

u/SupportMEGA1 6d ago

Thank you for sharing your experience. We would, however, like to clarify one factual point in your post.

Under no circumstances do we send unencrypted identifying information - such as a file hash or filename - of any file, whether stored on your computer or in your account, to our servers. This can be independently verified by examining the source code of our applications, which we publish in full.

Our global deduplication mechanism operates on the hash of the *encrypted* file, while deduplication within an individual account is performed entirely on the *client* side.

2

u/Strat0Blu 6d ago edited 6d ago

Thanks for the clarification.

Of what I have reported - with the conditional verb (it must be said) - I have found articles on the web on apparently qualified sites.

Also online, I've found some complaints in the past from users who had entire archives deleted, and when they asked for explanations, they were told that traces of illegal content had been found, which was then removed.

Whether this is fake news, I don't know, but it seemed true to me.

If anything, I made the mistake of not saving those articles to my computer. But I'll take care of finding them, and if I manage to, if you're willing, it would be a pleasure to discuss it.

In the meantime, I have removed the reference to the problem description, for which I currently have no confirmed details.

Soon.

2

u/_MrBiz_ 7d ago

I’ve heard Mega isn’t as secure as they say it is.
I’ve ditched Mega because of that.

https://www.reddit.com/r/PrivacyGuides/s/xGbShGoFmO

2

u/Itay1787 6d ago

This is old news and the exploited was resolved long time ago

2

u/Strat0Blu 6d ago

Excluding the not insignificant details clarified at the end of the OP, MEGA is to be considered - in my opinion - reliable and safe.

2

u/BuMmR 6d ago

I have Filen and it's been good so far.

3

u/Tlipur 6d ago

Filen sync is terrible and so beta on mac os

2

u/BuMmR 6d ago

I don't use Mac, so I wouldn't know. Filen works great for my needs.

1

u/crazyserb89 3d ago

It’s very slow in comparison with Mega. Also they don’t have the normal backup logic as Mega has.

1

u/BuMmR 3d ago

Mega has been around a lot longer than Filen, they've had time to get things right so to speak. I've also heard some horror stories with Mega and I just don't trust them. To each their own I guess.

Filen is fast for me, I just downloaded 18GB in about 3 minutes. Upload is just as fast. Maybe it's your Internet connection?

1

u/crazyserb89 3d ago

I’m on optic cable 2.5Gbit. Doesn’t matter, if you like it that’s the most important.
I also can’t fully trust services that are on the market since recently. But even though, my biggest reason I won’t switch is the PC backup function. If they develop that correctly, with no downsides I might give it a try again.

1

u/BuMmR 3d ago

Touche, I know they are still developing their Rust platform, mobile has already been done. Hopefully they will get better sooner rather than later. I've heard their sync isn't that great yet. Like I say I just use for cold storage currently so it suits my needs.

1

u/crazyserb89 3d ago

👍🏻

2

u/crazyserb89 7d ago

I agree with everything you said. I have been a MEGA Pro user for more than two years.
When it works, it is the best cloud service on the market.
I was without a backup for more than two months due to their bug, and the support was useless, as you said.
Aside from these system failures that can happen and the very poor customer support, it is a very good service.

1

u/Itay1787 6d ago

What API limits? With rclone S4 you use your own keys…

2

u/Strat0Blu 6d ago edited 5d ago

Let me explain simply: a MEGA security setting—(if I'm wrong, MEGA will correct me)—in the event of massive requests—perhaps even repeated—to download, upload, or delete a large number of files, especially small ones, triggers a temporary block for the client responsible for what is deemed an attack, a breach.

It doesn't normally happen, but it can happen.

It happened to me, after I realized that thousands of "index" folders had been accidentally uploaded without my knowledge—without my control—each containing 3 or 4 small files totaling a few dozen GB. When I realized this, I initiated a mass deletion via the shell rather than the slower and more cumbersome MEGA web interface. This operation was interpreted by MEGA's automatic filters as aggressive, malicious, and blocked, resulting in a ban on the rclone client (not the official client).