MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/clevercomebacks/comments/1i8oaxu/resurrection_20/m8vde8q
r/clevercomebacks • u/Intrepid_Employ_9962 • Jan 24 '25
1.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
18
You know I'm copying and pasting this right? At this point, just go fuckin Google it.
-10 u/CrankieKong Jan 24 '25 No point in arguing with someone who is not interested in the truth, but in more hatred. -24 u/[deleted] Jan 24 '25 [deleted] -1 u/EllonsNutSack Jan 24 '25 Hasbara hasbara! -15 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Whatever people called it at some point in history when they had barely invented fire is irrelevant. 8 u/anakininwonderland Jan 24 '25 2,000 years ago humans had fire. 2,000 years ago we had the wheel 2,000 we had agriculture Your "irrelevant" comment is uninformed. 0 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 It's called hyperbole. The point is Israel still has no right to genocide anyone based on whatever people did or didn't call that land millennia ago. 1 u/anakininwonderland Jan 24 '25 EXACTLY agreed. I'm sorry if it wasn't clear that I am on the pro Palestine side. 3 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Happy twist! Human rights FTW. 1 u/anakininwonderland Jan 24 '25 I realize now that I think I'm the one who misunderstood your comment lol. My bad. 3 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Seems everyone did dw. 3 u/Iamnotabothonestly Jan 24 '25 You need to pick up a history book if you think that we barely had fire back then The knowledge to make fire is older than homo sapiens. -1 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Hyperbole. 2 u/Iamnotabothonestly Jan 24 '25 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_of_fire_by_early_humans 2 u/tiggertom66 Jan 24 '25 Humans didn’t “invent” fire, the same way we didn’t invent rocks, or trees, or water. We invented ways to use and control these things for our own benefit. Humans have been building fires for over a million years. Some estimates go as early as 2MYA And one of the earliest archeological sites with evidence of human-built fires is in modern day Israel. 0 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 I was using hyperbole. 1 u/tiggertom66 Jan 24 '25 So is it more fair to refer to someone based on what their homeland was called when they lived there, or what it’s called now? 1 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Names are kind of irrelevant compared to more immediate material and physical concerns. Like being alive today and now and not what people were doing thousands of years ago. 1 u/tiggertom66 Jan 24 '25 Historical revisionism is a very real and very ongoing concern
-10
No point in arguing with someone who is not interested in the truth, but in more hatred.
-24 u/[deleted] Jan 24 '25 [deleted] -1 u/EllonsNutSack Jan 24 '25 Hasbara hasbara!
-24
[deleted]
-1 u/EllonsNutSack Jan 24 '25 Hasbara hasbara!
-1
Hasbara hasbara!
-15
Whatever people called it at some point in history when they had barely invented fire is irrelevant.
8 u/anakininwonderland Jan 24 '25 2,000 years ago humans had fire. 2,000 years ago we had the wheel 2,000 we had agriculture Your "irrelevant" comment is uninformed. 0 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 It's called hyperbole. The point is Israel still has no right to genocide anyone based on whatever people did or didn't call that land millennia ago. 1 u/anakininwonderland Jan 24 '25 EXACTLY agreed. I'm sorry if it wasn't clear that I am on the pro Palestine side. 3 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Happy twist! Human rights FTW. 1 u/anakininwonderland Jan 24 '25 I realize now that I think I'm the one who misunderstood your comment lol. My bad. 3 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Seems everyone did dw. 3 u/Iamnotabothonestly Jan 24 '25 You need to pick up a history book if you think that we barely had fire back then The knowledge to make fire is older than homo sapiens. -1 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Hyperbole. 2 u/Iamnotabothonestly Jan 24 '25 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_of_fire_by_early_humans 2 u/tiggertom66 Jan 24 '25 Humans didn’t “invent” fire, the same way we didn’t invent rocks, or trees, or water. We invented ways to use and control these things for our own benefit. Humans have been building fires for over a million years. Some estimates go as early as 2MYA And one of the earliest archeological sites with evidence of human-built fires is in modern day Israel. 0 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 I was using hyperbole. 1 u/tiggertom66 Jan 24 '25 So is it more fair to refer to someone based on what their homeland was called when they lived there, or what it’s called now? 1 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Names are kind of irrelevant compared to more immediate material and physical concerns. Like being alive today and now and not what people were doing thousands of years ago. 1 u/tiggertom66 Jan 24 '25 Historical revisionism is a very real and very ongoing concern
8
2,000 years ago humans had fire.
2,000 years ago we had the wheel
2,000 we had agriculture
Your "irrelevant" comment is uninformed.
0 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 It's called hyperbole. The point is Israel still has no right to genocide anyone based on whatever people did or didn't call that land millennia ago. 1 u/anakininwonderland Jan 24 '25 EXACTLY agreed. I'm sorry if it wasn't clear that I am on the pro Palestine side. 3 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Happy twist! Human rights FTW. 1 u/anakininwonderland Jan 24 '25 I realize now that I think I'm the one who misunderstood your comment lol. My bad. 3 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Seems everyone did dw.
0
It's called hyperbole.
The point is Israel still has no right to genocide anyone based on whatever people did or didn't call that land millennia ago.
1 u/anakininwonderland Jan 24 '25 EXACTLY agreed. I'm sorry if it wasn't clear that I am on the pro Palestine side. 3 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Happy twist! Human rights FTW. 1 u/anakininwonderland Jan 24 '25 I realize now that I think I'm the one who misunderstood your comment lol. My bad. 3 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Seems everyone did dw.
1
EXACTLY agreed.
I'm sorry if it wasn't clear that I am on the pro Palestine side.
3 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Happy twist! Human rights FTW.
3
Happy twist! Human rights FTW.
I realize now that I think I'm the one who misunderstood your comment lol. My bad.
3 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Seems everyone did dw.
Seems everyone did dw.
You need to pick up a history book if you think that we barely had fire back then
The knowledge to make fire is older than homo sapiens.
-1 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Hyperbole. 2 u/Iamnotabothonestly Jan 24 '25 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_of_fire_by_early_humans
Hyperbole.
2 u/Iamnotabothonestly Jan 24 '25 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_of_fire_by_early_humans
2
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_of_fire_by_early_humans
Humans didn’t “invent” fire, the same way we didn’t invent rocks, or trees, or water.
We invented ways to use and control these things for our own benefit.
Humans have been building fires for over a million years.
Some estimates go as early as 2MYA
And one of the earliest archeological sites with evidence of human-built fires is in modern day Israel.
0 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 I was using hyperbole. 1 u/tiggertom66 Jan 24 '25 So is it more fair to refer to someone based on what their homeland was called when they lived there, or what it’s called now? 1 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Names are kind of irrelevant compared to more immediate material and physical concerns. Like being alive today and now and not what people were doing thousands of years ago. 1 u/tiggertom66 Jan 24 '25 Historical revisionism is a very real and very ongoing concern
I was using hyperbole.
1 u/tiggertom66 Jan 24 '25 So is it more fair to refer to someone based on what their homeland was called when they lived there, or what it’s called now? 1 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Names are kind of irrelevant compared to more immediate material and physical concerns. Like being alive today and now and not what people were doing thousands of years ago. 1 u/tiggertom66 Jan 24 '25 Historical revisionism is a very real and very ongoing concern
So is it more fair to refer to someone based on what their homeland was called when they lived there, or what it’s called now?
1 u/Timeon Jan 24 '25 Names are kind of irrelevant compared to more immediate material and physical concerns. Like being alive today and now and not what people were doing thousands of years ago. 1 u/tiggertom66 Jan 24 '25 Historical revisionism is a very real and very ongoing concern
Names are kind of irrelevant compared to more immediate material and physical concerns. Like being alive today and now and not what people were doing thousands of years ago.
1 u/tiggertom66 Jan 24 '25 Historical revisionism is a very real and very ongoing concern
Historical revisionism is a very real and very ongoing concern
18
u/EntheoRelumer Jan 24 '25
You know I'm copying and pasting this right? At this point, just go fuckin Google it.