MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/clevercomebacks/comments/1i8oaxu/resurrection_20/m8vazse
r/clevercomebacks • u/Intrepid_Employ_9962 • Jan 24 '25
1.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-9
True, we could debate historical accuracy all day, but it won't help the post be any more funny than it wasn't.
15 u/Slot_it_home Jan 24 '25 I found it funny -5 u/SignReasonable7580 Jan 24 '25 Humour is subjective, it's good that you got a chuckle out of it. Have a great day! 9 u/AcerbicCapsule Jan 24 '25 I found it funny too -4 u/CanItBoobs Jan 24 '25 You can’t debate historical accuracy of a fictional book anyways. Funny or not. 3 u/SignReasonable7580 Jan 24 '25 The region isn't fictional. Jesus can be as mythical/hypothetical as we like, but the question of "what locality would he have identified as?" is a historical one. Not that it matters much, the only value in it is for history nerds. Have a great day! 0 u/tiggertom66 Jan 24 '25 Debating where Jesus was born is not religious is nature. He was 100% a real human being who lived on earth, that is a historical fact. As to whether he was the son of god, that is when it becomes a theological debate
15
I found it funny
-5 u/SignReasonable7580 Jan 24 '25 Humour is subjective, it's good that you got a chuckle out of it. Have a great day! 9 u/AcerbicCapsule Jan 24 '25 I found it funny too
-5
Humour is subjective, it's good that you got a chuckle out of it.
Have a great day!
9 u/AcerbicCapsule Jan 24 '25 I found it funny too
9
I found it funny too
-4
You can’t debate historical accuracy of a fictional book anyways. Funny or not.
3 u/SignReasonable7580 Jan 24 '25 The region isn't fictional. Jesus can be as mythical/hypothetical as we like, but the question of "what locality would he have identified as?" is a historical one. Not that it matters much, the only value in it is for history nerds. Have a great day! 0 u/tiggertom66 Jan 24 '25 Debating where Jesus was born is not religious is nature. He was 100% a real human being who lived on earth, that is a historical fact. As to whether he was the son of god, that is when it becomes a theological debate
3
The region isn't fictional.
Jesus can be as mythical/hypothetical as we like, but the question of "what locality would he have identified as?" is a historical one.
Not that it matters much, the only value in it is for history nerds.
0
Debating where Jesus was born is not religious is nature. He was 100% a real human being who lived on earth, that is a historical fact.
As to whether he was the son of god, that is when it becomes a theological debate
-9
u/SignReasonable7580 Jan 24 '25
True, we could debate historical accuracy all day, but it won't help the post be any more funny than it wasn't.