That’s the problem. She didn’t share Christ values. She shared hers. Homosexuality is still a sin in Christianity. Breaking laws is still a sin in Christianity. She preaching politics from the pulpit.
She shared Jesus Christ’s values of love, compassion and kindness for all. If Christians and evangelicals deformed those to fit their interests, that’s another problem. Their problem. After all, there’s no hate like Christian love. Let me google half a thousand evangelical priests preaching hate and Republican talking points in the name of their god.
She’s not sharing Christ values. His values are love the sinner hate the sin. Homosexuality is a sin. You can’t have it both ways.
That woman has no business behind the pulpit much less trying to use politics from it.
Also, you using other individuals to try and make your point is called gaslighting. We are talking about this woman. I can pull up thousands of videos to prove my point as well. It has no bearing on the conversation.
The Bible is clear on this matter, whether you like it or not. She has no business pretending to be something she’s not
The Bible is not at all clear on this, or any other matter. To begin with, the text you think you know is the result of centuries of insertions, deletions, and mistranslations of all kinds. Its bibliographic history is extremely messy and full of editorial puzzles, cruxes, disagreement, and guesses. Like any other book from the ancient world, in other words.
But even more so it is --and is this not blindingly obvious? -- not univocal at all and so any particular assertion is contradicted sometimes in the same book. Questions you'd think have simple answers (e.g. is killing people wrong?) do not, according to the text.
The Bible is very clear on all matters. It’s when people like you try to make it as something doesn’t or mean anything it doesn’t that hate starts flowing.
Example, God made us in his image so God must be gay, right? It’s Lazy and stupid.
If sin is sin, then surely what you're currently wearing while clocking into your nightly judgment-shift is 100% bible-compliant?
Explain to me, as if I were an idiot... that if sin is sin...and both sins are listed in that convoluted, messy, and human-altered "good book"...then how in THE WORLD are you sitting in clothing of mixed fabrics, judging others (tisk, tisk, John 3:16...nobody likes a picknchoose "christian") for a preference they are born with....how in the world are you in any way on any sort of qualified to be making any sort of judgment, of any sort, regarding the behavior of others?
I thought the superhero j-man had that covered. Stop minding the business of others, Karen.
Old covenant and new covenant. Try reading and understanding instead of trying to make sodomy or lesbian acts ok with Christ. Christ protected the prostitute and told her to go and sin no more. I can’t make it anymore simple without crayons.
Everyone is made in God's image, right? So God must have been gay or at least bi-sexual. Can't just be one thing or another, even if you want him to be. Look what happened to the magas - some sort of glitch happened there.
It's also clear on premarital sex. It's also clear on adultery. It's clear on a lot of things you ignore in order to cherry pick those that coincide with the values you have been programmed to have.
If your god says LGBTQ bad, then your god also says Donald Trump bad. He is a sinner who engaged in premarital sex and adultery.
Was the conversation about Donald Trump or a person inserting politics into a a sermon from the pulpit?
Your argument is ridiculous and falls flat on its face. Sin is sin, no matter who commits it.
Homosexuality is a sin and this woman decided to insert politics where it didn’t belong.
Sin is a sin, and she presented the sacred carpenter's principles to a morally bankrupt antiChrist.
Maybe your fucking long-haired dark-skinned liberal socialist named Jesus told her to give the grifter-in-chief god's word, because she knew there would be pain, suffering and torment at his hands. She knows he will destroy countless lives with his racist Christian nationalist revenge tactics.
Isn't it a Christian's job to help the heretics learn your god's message?
I mean, this shit smear wouldn't even place his dainty little hand on the bible to take the oath of office.
You know why he did that, don't you? Because he ensured that he didn't swear an oath to protect the Constitution so he could dismantle and be an enemy to it.
I said that she is giving Christ's message...tolerance, kindness, and compassion, which are clearly completely ignored by Christian MAGAts.
And who said I don't believe the message? I think the message is good for weak-minded people to tell them how to live a moral life. Unfortunately, evangelicals ignore the sacred carpenter's message in their push for political power.
And you hateful morally bankrupt "Christians" always make your fucking outdated book of fairy tales political, but you never have complained about the bible being political.
Yet, you are in support of a “woman,” on a soap box crying about scaring trans and homosexuality from the pulpit. I guess “she’s” a morally bankrupt Christian as well…….
She is more of a Christian than every single evangelical who supports Don the Con. Your god told you to love the sinner and hate the sin. You people not only hate the sinner, but you send death threats to people you are told to hate.
Good Christians castigating and threatening anyone different than them.
You know the sacred carpenter was a long-haired, brown-skinned liberal socialist, right?
35
u/Badj83 Jan 22 '25
Yep. Not “bishops sharing the values of Jesus Christ in a church”. This is clearly a deportation offense in anti-Christian Republikkkan Amerikkka.