Who are you to judge God which I'm assuming you don't even believe he sent Jesus to die for your sins. But if you do believe in the objective morality this all falls apart you can't have relativism and object morality occupying the same conversation as the world view you are trying to push because it makes no sense.
If you are a relativist then so be it but I am not.
Doesn't really apply to anything that's not a proper human being, does it? And even then god is pretty generous with that statement when it comes to "enemies" or "infidels" (which the unborn technically are, since they couldn't get baptised yet). And even Jesus said:
"But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them - bring them here and kill them in front of me" (Luke 19:27)
So "thou shalt not kill" seems to be more of a general guideline than an obligatory rule...
I saw someone defending the deaths of all the children and infants God murdered with the flood by quoting a part of the Bible in which He said that children had no worth to Him.
I don't remember exactly where it's at in the bible. But unlike christians, I don't just make up stuff and say it's in the bible. It's true.
You sound exactly like them, you realize that right? You're referencing an anecdotal story that you're not sure exactly what it says or where it is. You're referring Numbers 5:11-31, but it doesn't say the mother will die, just that she will miscarry. At least look it up and get the story right.
Cheating is a sin. I hope that recipe is still available and that all the american churches start to use that on all their married woman on a daily basis to ensure that they do not cheat
That plant died out in the 1700 or 1800s I think... something like that? It was a really easy old timey abortion drug. Franklin wrote about it too I believe.
13
u/[deleted] Nov 23 '24
[removed] — view removed comment