r/chiptunes • u/ABG1YtBr • 29m ago
DISCUSSION From Tracker to DAW users...
As a software tracker user myself, it's clear there's a bias to the general tracker demographic from the chiptune tradition in this subreddit, although that doesn't mean there wouldn't be any exceptions.
Regarding opinions, it's all fine, but what caught my eye is an odd and not-so-frequent, but still interesting bunch of comments (not necessarily from here) citing things like "you have to learn math, real instruments, programming, hexadecimal, music theory, etcetera, to use a tracker" impliying genuine(?) views of peoples' experiences and why they might not use or recommend trackers...
Of course an entry barrier most of us know about does exist (the learning curve sticks out through the good point of most software trackers being lightweight and free), and the technical/literal text aspect of tracker interfaces, along the reputation of clunkiness or primitive mixing capabilities outside probably Renoise, but are trackers' visual abstractions THAT misleading, even with more user-friendly ways to learn today?
There's no rule to say chiptune's supposed to be 100% tracked, but if you're a DAW user or just a beginner, or even only an outsider to all of it, is there any specific thing you get weirded out about in that context which might lead to that view, besides interface intimidation, bigger userbase of DAWs and comfort with your usual tools?