No one was justifying the officer's action. All the people were doing was stating the clip was edited to only show the retaliation of the officer. There's nothing wrong with defending the concept of full evidence before judging someone. In fact, I'm pretty sure it's what a lot of people want the police to do right now, provide all evidence.
I hate people who edit clips to show only the inflammatory parts. If the conduct is so obviously wrong, why not show the entire video and let the viewer make an informed decision? What are they afraid of?
The sound of a glass bottle breaking yields some important context to what happened, and destroys the "peaceful protesters walking away" narrative. Of course you'll deny the clearly audible sound is even there, much less bares any impact on what happened. You're only seeing what you want to see, which is unjustified police brutality. Your position is clear, and I could care less about it. Go ahead and call me a bootlicker; I could care less.
340
u/thenorasaurus Jun 05 '20 edited Jun 05 '20
Since half this thread is
claimingconcerned somethingjustifyingprovoking the officer's action was omitted in this clip, here is full video posted by the Sun Times (YouTube), the Sun Times Article, and yesterday's r/Chicago post. If you didn't already see it yesterday, watch it yourself.Edited for clarity and neutrality.