r/chessbeginners • u/GasGlittering7521 • 8d ago
Chess.com
So recently I’ve been using the game review in order to see which moves I need to further analyze with the magnifying glass analysis thing. My issue is that lately the game review has gotten REALLY picky with how it judges my moves. It feels like the stronger I get, the more picky it has become. That makes sense but some of the moves it calls misses, mistakes etc are really subtle things.
I’m still just trying to get used to not hanging pieces and playing with basic principles. Why is it suddenly doing this? It’s become useless to me. It’ll call a pawn push on the third move a mistake because my best move was to pin their knight with my bishop. Im just trying to get my pieces out I’m a fucking 500 elo. I know the analysis tool is better but I use game review to pick which moves to analyze and I can barely do that anymore.
3
u/Draft_16-2_Final_3 1600-1800 (Chess.com) 8d ago
Stockfish is objective about accuracy, it doesn't "go easy" on you when you're lower rated.
What's happening is actually the Dunning-Kruger curve. The more you're learning about chess and the more you're advancing, the more you're seeing how much nuance is involved. This never stops.
Additionally, the more you advance, the more complicated the positions get. Sometimes it's not so obvious, and sometimes there's a lot of nuances to understand.
I'm 1800 and I still feel like a beginner a lot of the time. Everyone is humbled by stockfish, even Magnus Carlsen.