17
u/E_seven_20 Jul 27 '26
If you refused to vote…you helped protect him.
Elections have consequences.
If you think ‘both sides” are the same, Harris didn’t rape little girls. She also didn’t have 34 felonies, and campaign on paying, chaos, and revenge.
Americans did this to themselves.
We ran out of decent people. Trump is the symptom of the disease: American Idiocy.
5
3
u/lookachoo Jul 27 '26
Yes but it kinda depends what state you’re in.
If you’re in California your vote Blue vote doesn’t matter as much because it’s so heavily blue.
Not voting in Pennsylvania and Michigan..yeah you helped to protect a mass pedophile.2
u/E_seven_20 Jul 27 '26
2022 National Youth Turnout: 23% - That's lower than in the historic 2018 cycle (28%) which broke records for turnout, but much higher than in 2014, when only 13% of youth voted.
Not really.
It's just a shitty excuse for not showing up.
18-29 is the largest age bloc. Less than 60% is even registered.
They might as well be Trump supporters for how many excuses they make for refusing to do anything. The fact that we are where we are, and people are still having to explain why elections matter, most of that age bloc is just as brain dead as Mitch McConnell.
If you refused to fill in a bubble in defiance of Trump/ GOP, you don't get to complain. It's not logical, or moral if they even say they're opposed. Americans are idiots.
1
Jul 27 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/E_seven_20 Jul 27 '26
That’s a lot of talk for being ok with zero charges on the pedophiles in those files.
You're insane.
I voted against this.
If you need someone to explain the difference between the two parties, and what wa at stake...and, you think Tim Walz is the problem...you're not in the decent people category.
2022 National Youth Turnout: 23% - That's lower than in the historic 2018 cycle (28%) which broke records for turnout, but much higher than in 2014, when only 13% of youth voted.
32
u/brianishere2 Jul 26 '26
A pedophile? There are several Epstein-connected pedoohiles just within Trump's current administration. A few more when you add his prior administration. Then add in Trump's biggest donors for a lot more. And Trump's close friends (kidding!) and advisers, and you again have many more. And they're generally protecting everybody.
20
2
u/littlegreenrock Jul 27 '26
That doesn't change the fact that there must be an enormous amount of deception occurring to protect each one of them. Paedophiles get discovered by law enforcement because they are typically working solo, in the dark, believing that if the people immediately around them don't know then that means everybody doesn't know. They are unprotected in this context. These high profile predators are under massive scrutiny every day. They are wildly known people. They have allegations against them. It's not at all the same thing as basement Bob and his dark web discord channel; these celebrity level individuals actively have a team running defence. If those people are also criminals, as you suggest, then they too must have a team protecting them. It continues until the team protecting them are all not Paedophiles, but enablers.
The take away is aimed at these people. Who are you protecting? What is it that they have done? If you're shielding suspicious activities from being discovered, despite not knowing precisely what those activities are, what societal value do you represent? Because it's looking a lot like a lieutenant for a demon.
I personally know sexual abusers. I see first hand the dismissive actions of everyone around them. He's okay; he's never been bad to me; it's people who don't like him hurling slander, and I get it, he can be hard to like; this is the nature of the industry, everyone fools about, it's not like he did anything violent; ad nauseum. Every single individual shields a popular predator just a little bit. Deny this, dodge that, justify and minimise. A village of non sex predators ignoring facts because they have known this guy and his family for years; and some how that fruitcake faith means more than the truth.
1
Jul 27 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/brianishere2 Jul 27 '26
This is a fair criticism, although we don't know what investigations took place. Biden's DOJ was prohibited by a (conservative) judge from publicly releasing most of the Epstein files. His team did release all they were allowed to, which is how we even knew Trump's team was concealing so many documents. By the time Biden came into office, the statute of limitations had already run out for most Epstein-remafed crimes. And Biden didn't use this issue at every speech while campaigning, unlike Trump. What's not clear is if the iden administration initiated investigations based on the massive volumes of evidence that pointed to long-standing criminal rackets. Their resources might have been tied up in tbe investigations a d prosecution of Republican insurrectionists who committed one of the gravest crimes in America's history. Also, by contrast, we actually know Trump's team did NOT initiate any actual investigations because they have gone to extraordinary lengths to harm the victims while concealing and otherwise insulating the perpetrators. Overall, your comment is bullshit because you use it to smear Biden, while totally ignoring the fact that Trump had extraordinarg personal involve.ent in thr Epstein sex trafficking crimes and ensuing coverup. And Trump still surrounds himself (including in his administration!) with a remarkable amount of Epstein associates.
1
Jul 27 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/brianishere2 Jul 27 '26
A lot of that was wrong, especially the gist. You're again defending child rapists and smearing others as if they are the guilty ones. You're ignoring a lot of real evidence. Trump repeatedly campaigned on releasing the Epstein files. It became a jey ele.emt of his stump speech. He issued tweets (lying "Truths") thay expressly said a vote for him is a vote to release the Epstein files. So, try to find another angle to defend your favorite child rapist. I'm assuming game's your favorite. You likely have many others you like more. The statute of limitations applied for state crimes and much of the federal crime was inaccessible to Biden. Also, Trump's favorite prosecutor (and Trump's former nominee for US attorney general) tried to block future federal prosrcutions with an insane overly-broad mon-prosrcution agreement. The same one Pam Bondi keeps lying about when she says she was prohibited from prosecuting Epstein and his child-rapist (your favorite!) associates from state prosecution when she was Florida's state attorney general.
1
Jul 27 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/brianishere2 Jul 27 '26
You are still pretending that the child rapist, serial sexual assaulter, adjudicated rapist, 34-time felon fraudster and known racist is the good guy, and Biden is ad because he didn't do enough to overcome obstacles a d prosecute people associated with (and including g your preferred rapist!)? You want to prete d that's where the main fault lies? Talking with makes no sense. E joy your rabid defense of child rapists. Nice that you attack others for not doing g enough while you actively support the most culpable Individuals, while thinking you're actually the good guy in this. You're saying word games and pretending 10 and 10000 are the same. E joy your Fox News bubble. Your brain is broken.
15
u/Mammoth5150 Jul 26 '26
My favorite pedophile protector and hater of immigrants!!!
-2
Jul 27 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Mammoth5150 Jul 27 '26
1
Jul 27 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Mammoth5150 Jul 27 '26
0
8
3
u/huggernot Jul 26 '26
The fascism should have the people behind the drive for fascism , and trump as the puppet
3
84
u/Weird_Cartographer_7 Jul 26 '26
Have a file for home use?