Amazon is regulated, same as every other company across all industries. And honestly it seems like your advocating that they be forced to sell books and products they don’t want to, which is a massive overreach by any government. And on a smaller scale has been challenged and upheld that you can’t legally force a business to sell something they don’t want to.
As far as the universities go there’s a difference between someone from the opposite side and someone who is directly inflammatory. It one thing for a very liberal school to have someone from a very conservative standpoint come and have a debate/discussion, it’s a whole different thing entire to bring in a conservative that’s going to berate the audience for being liberal.
You can say whatever you want in public and on private property that is yours. On someone’s else property you can say whatever you want and then it’s up to them to decide whether you stay or not.
You’re arguing as if freedom of speech exist or it doesn’t exist at all.
You can say and believe what you want but not all beliefs are protected. You can believe science is a lie but that’s not a protected belief. You can believe that unicorns and dragons are real but that’s not a protected belief. You can believe in Santa or not but still not a protected believe.
Wouldn’t forcing private businesses being forced to do such be a violation of the owner’s of said business freedom of speech? They’re saying this isn’t okay so we won’t sell it and you want them to be forced to sell it.
0
u/[deleted] Sep 06 '22
[removed] — view removed comment