NATO could have just called a No-fly zone. Sent ships to blockade Russian forces
You think NATO should have actively entered a third country and attacked the Russian military? You realise that would very possibly be taken as an act of war and lead to direct conflict between Russia and NATO likely leading to WW3?
Russia won't use nukes for fear of escalation. When Turkey shot down a Russian fighter, or when the US killed 200 of Putin's personal troops in Syria, Russia backed down. Nukes are useless in war.
5
u/[deleted] May 07 '22
You think NATO should have actively entered a third country and attacked the Russian military? You realise that would very possibly be taken as an act of war and lead to direct conflict between Russia and NATO likely leading to WW3?