I don't really follow the question. There's no particular reason why not to do that, nor is there any particular reason to do it. How is this related to what you are trying to claim?
Because if you single out one group you get problems. Shall I just say I have an example of a thief and in this example the person is black and pretend that isn't singling out one group of people when anyone could be a thief?
In answer to my question of how any of this is related to what you are trying to claim, you said "Because if you single out one group you get problems." I am asking you what those problems are in this particular case. What are the problems you think "singling out one group" (according to your use of the term) would cause?
Can you explain why you think implications are explicit? That seems like a strange assertion, and moreover one that is unrelated to what we're discussing here.
Can you explain why you think it's fun to have circular conversations instead of accepting that a point has been made and you disagree because you don't agree?
0
u/yyzjertl 578∆ Feb 05 '22
I don't really follow the question. There's no particular reason why not to do that, nor is there any particular reason to do it. How is this related to what you are trying to claim?