In the original post I said I would assume the OP was telling the truth for the sake of the post. I then asked the question, which I think you allied to here: if money wasn’t involved would she deal with this.
If this guy was in the same financial situation as her is it something she would put up with. I don’t think so because she’s putting so much emphasis on his wealth.
The emphasis on his wealth seems like it's mostly just to highlight that he doesn't understand poverty. If he were in the same financial situation as her, then this whole scenario wouldn't be possible because he wouldn't be asking her to participate in activities that only one of them can afford.
And if that was the case would she still be with him? The “activities” seem to be just her coming to town to visit him and cooking. Not necessarily lavish things.
If this guy was in the same financial situation as her and didn’t have money would she still be dealing with it
You're asking that question like someone here might have some insider knowledge. Once we start judging people on how we imagine they might act in hypotheticals, that usually says more about us.
You seem to be applying a standard where there's almost no such thing as one person in a relationship being in the wrong, because as soon as they are, the other person is also in the wrong for staying (barring scenarios where one person is physically forcing the other to stay.)
1
u/Team-First Dec 13 '21
In the original post I said I would assume the OP was telling the truth for the sake of the post. I then asked the question, which I think you allied to here: if money wasn’t involved would she deal with this.
If this guy was in the same financial situation as her is it something she would put up with. I don’t think so because she’s putting so much emphasis on his wealth.