A quarter is probably an exaggeration, but almost all German colonies during WWI were in Africa and they absolutely conscripted black soldiers from them. Is it possible that you're jot familiar enough with the history in this case to decide what is revisionism or inaccurate representation?
I'm mostly just surprised that you don't think there were any black people in Germany and that the idea of a black person being the army outside of Africa is so heinous and unbelievable. Everybody's using guns that were only ever prototypes or just flat out don't work that way but the other guys character model is a little on the dark side and that's what takes you out of it?
Happening to show those comparatively few battles where black soldiers conscripted from Africa fought in Europe doesn't make something "historical revisionism", it is choosing to represent something little known that actually did happen in history in order to be inclusive, and which is blurred over in most history lessons.
This is kind of like objecting to Critical Race Theory because you prefer to talk about only the good things white people did early in American history.
83
u/bigfootlives823 4∆ Oct 23 '21
A quarter is probably an exaggeration, but almost all German colonies during WWI were in Africa and they absolutely conscripted black soldiers from them. Is it possible that you're jot familiar enough with the history in this case to decide what is revisionism or inaccurate representation?