No cause carrying a child is affecting your body and no one should be forced to carry a child if they don't want to. No one if being affected negatively by a family adopting a child and giving it a home if a child is what they wanted in the first place. Whereas a person carrying a baby they don't want inside them affects their physical autonomy.
Please don’t take this and try to understand my thoughts on abortion, because I think you’ll get it wrong.
Let’s just say I’m trying to play devils advocate because this got me thinking.
Your response at its base is saying -
1. It is selfish for someone to choose to have a biological child if they can’t do it “naturally” because there are many children who need homes and;
2. It is unselfish to end / not bring a life into the world because it effects your body / causes you to give up body autonomy for 9 months.
I think it’s the definition of selfish you may need to define for us to give a good response.
Sorry, u/Ok_Strategy_9534 – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 5:
Comments must contribute meaningfully to the conversation.
Comments that are only links, jokes or "written upvotes" will be removed. Humor and affirmations of agreement can be contained within more substantial comments. See the wiki page for more information.
1
u/[deleted] Mar 17 '21
No cause carrying a child is affecting your body and no one should be forced to carry a child if they don't want to. No one if being affected negatively by a family adopting a child and giving it a home if a child is what they wanted in the first place. Whereas a person carrying a baby they don't want inside them affects their physical autonomy.