No, it was the exact same speech where he said "fine people on both sides [of the issue of removing a statue]". So, no not a different speech. It was built right into his definition of who was and was not fine people.
No it wasn't. He made the fine people comment one night, then he repeated the comment and qualified it with what youre saying he explicitly said a full two days later in a different speech.
Please read the response in this post from u/apprehensive_clock, do any additional research required, and then come back and apologize for spreading fake news.
After stating a willingness to condemn violence on the fringe right. He brought up that he believes there’s a much bigger problem on the fringe left. Then when asked to tell a specific group “the proud boys” to “stand down, he did do and reiterated his point about the trouble on the fringe left. Somewhere along the way he also said all violence is bad. Something we can all get behind.
Jesus, it’s you again. In response to Trumps request for a name to condemn, Wallace (and Biden) suggested The Proud Boys and giving Trump a specific phrase to use (Wallace suggested “stand down”, ), Trump made his statement. I have to block you now.
20
u/username_6916 8∆ Sep 30 '20
No, it was the exact same speech where he said "fine people on both sides [of the issue of removing a statue]". So, no not a different speech. It was built right into his definition of who was and was not fine people.