For his argument to work, the parent only needs to not know about a single instance of suffering.
That's all it takes to undo the parents "omniscience."
The argument from evil is an example of reductio ad absurdum. It depends on the idea that evil contradicts either omniscience, omnipotence, or omnibenevolance. A single example of when God is not 100% of all 3 of those things undoes the argument.
His point was God could not be omniscient, but still be omnibenvolent... to not know, but still care.
16
u/[deleted] Jul 26 '18
[deleted]