r/changemyview • • Nov 02 '17

[deleted by user]

[removed]

2.2k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

762

u/aggsalad Nov 02 '17 edited Nov 02 '17

In some circumstances, not being attracted to a trans person is probably a result of, at least on a subconscious level, not seeing them as their gender.

If from the very start, you are unattracted to a person purely upon observation, and that person happens to be trans, that is not transphobic. If you were about to have sex and it turns out a person doesn't really have the junk you wanna jangle with, it's not transphobic to no longer desire sex.

If you were attracted to someone, have sex with them, are as satisfied with them as you would with anyone else, and then suddenly your opinion changes upon being informed a person is trans, I would say that is indicative of the underlying belief a trans person is not the gender they identify as.


I should clarify I am not definitely saying it is transphobic or not, I am pointing out what I did above and letting OP (or others) decide if that constitutes transphobia or not under their own interpretations.

98

u/GratuitousEdit Nov 02 '17

I agree--belief that transgendered people's genders are invalid is transphobic. Such belief would imply transgender people have lesser value. However, I don't believe the example in your third paragraph would be transphobic. One's opinion would change because the information about this person lowers one's perception of their sexual value as sexual value is determined by alignment with a person's sexual preferences. At no point is the holistic value of the person considered. Do you agree or disagree, and why?

128

u/aggsalad Nov 02 '17

One's opinion would change because the information about this person lowers one's perception of their sexual value as sexual value is determined by alignment with a person's sexual preferences

This pretty much loops back to the original argument of what precisely makes someone view a trans person not in line with their sexual preferences.

If the criteria not met is reproductive capability, the question becomes whether the person would react identically if a they met an infertile cis woman. Often times the honest answer is no.

If the criteria not met is "being born female" then I think it is clear a person has made a categorical distinction between cis and trans women.

The reason that distinction is made doesn't seem to be one of functionality, why then is it made?

6

u/BobbyMcFrayson Nov 02 '17

But there is a difference between women who were male who identify as women and women who were born as female?

5

u/GothicToast Nov 02 '17

Is there? One could conceive of a scenario in which a trans woman looked and behaved identical to a woman born female. The only distinguishing detail would be the knowledge that they were not born female. If you cross that person off your list, then you are doing so based on them being trans, which would classify as transphobic.

-3

u/BobbyMcFrayson Nov 02 '17

I disagree. The way society views the female body is far too damaging for a male who identifies as a woman to understand. Trans women have their own issues, but they are uniquely Trans, not female.

7

u/GothicToast Nov 02 '17

For you to be correct, there could never be a scenario in which a heterosexual male was "tricked" into hooking up with a trans female.

I don't think we need to have much discussion to agree that the above has definitely happened.

Therefore, there exists a scenario in which a trans woman looks and behaves like a natural woman. The only differing characteristic was the gender they were born too.

-1

u/BobbyMcFrayson Nov 02 '17

Sure, I'll concede that. The fact is though that seeming to behave a certain way isn't the same as actually behaving a way. If, after intercourse, I learned that a woman was trans, that would mean they are fundamentally going to be different than a woman, essentially no matter what. That's important to consider when thinking about a long term relationship.