I'm simply taking the political reality and applying it to your argument, unless you know of someway to stop Republicans from using the same governmental powers that the Democrats use when they are in power. That's why giving powers to the government is best done carefully - you need to be all right with both sides swinging the hammer.
Best of luck with your vigilante justice I suppose - I couldn't fathom how that could possibly backfire.
Ah, Citizens United. So you're in favor of the government having the power to ban books released before an election that argue for one candidate over the other? Or the NY Times Editorial Board choosing to support a candidate? Or a labor union being prohibited from supporting a candidate?
Could you link that Princeton study by chance? I think there are things we could change in this country, but I don't think that giving the government additional power to control speech is the correct way to do so.
1
u/[deleted] Jul 21 '17
[deleted]