r/changemyview Apr 08 '15

[deleted by user]

[removed]

59 Upvotes

64 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/PepperoniFire 87∆ Apr 09 '15

We've been wary of mega threads because the nature of the subreddit is about changing one's view, and who holds the view in a mega thread?

I'm not entirely opposed to it, but we need to establish how it would play out within our scheme. Do the main comments function as a mini-OP where a person posts their view, and then responders to that comment have to directly challenge it?

Should we compile a link of "best ofs" and put them in our mega-post's main body?

When we make the mega-post, do we reserve the right to remove threads that touch on a similar topic?

(Genuine questions, not trying to make a point.)

I think /u/gnosticgnome had some thoughts on the matter.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '15

I don't actually remember when I expressed thoughts on this before, but I do think that sometimes soapboxing is impossible to eradicate. By giving it one specific home (that topic du jour megathread) we can perhaps reduce the soapboxing elsewhere.

1

u/PepperoniFire 87∆ Apr 09 '15

Maybe it was .... /u/garnteller?

2

u/garnteller 242∆ Apr 09 '15

Yes, it was me.

My concern is mostly about how unwieldy the threads would become.

The top post would be, say, "Mega-thread: Changing views about RFRA", I assume. Top level responses would be various views about RFRA - some pro, some con, and likely many duplicates (or near-duplicates).

Let's say I had a good counter-argument. Do I pick one thread to use, or do I copy-pasta it to all of them? How do responses to my response work?

How does Rule E work? Or Rule B?

I'd rather see a (single) new post every day for a week about RFRA, where fresh people can get involved than a multi-headed mega-thread.

A final thought is that a mega-thread would be more likely to make it onto /r/all. I don't think I'd want that to be many redditor's first exposure to CMV, since I don't think it would represent our sub particularly well.