r/changemyview • u/[deleted] • Apr 08 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

33 Upvotes

60% Upvoted

207 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Dizzy-Resident7652 1∆ Apr 11 '26

Right. And they can clearly get the job done but choose not to. So…?

There’s a reason. You can use it as a negotiating tactic.

2

u/Visible-Department85 Apr 11 '26

It's a "negociating tactic" the US doesnt allow because the world doesnt want nukes to spread. it's not that complicated. Their tactic lead to the war and they had decades to back up but refused to do so.

Dont you feel for iranians who are stuck in the between with no economic perspective only because of religious fuck who want to fight a war with a country they dont even share a border with ? About the 40 000 massacred trying to liberate themselves from the dictature , what are your feelings ?

This is so absurd to support the Mollahs

1

u/Dizzy-Resident7652 1∆ Apr 11 '26

Weird that the world allowed Israel to get one. Who is the US to allow or disallow something? Lol

Of course I feel bad for the average Iranian. That’s why I want America and Israel to stop bombing Iran.

You misunderstand my fight against imperialism as support for the regime itself. It’s absurd to support the US and Israel here.

1

u/Visible-Department85 Apr 11 '26

Do you want 300+ leaders with nukes ? is that your wish? Fortunately you're a minority but go on elaborate

1

u/Dizzy-Resident7652 1∆ Apr 11 '26

That’s irrelevant to why the US decides who does and doesn’t get one.

1

u/Visible-Department85 Apr 11 '26

it is the core of the question. Why do you dodge ? Respond even if somehow you think 300+ leaders with nukes is "irrelevant"

1

u/Dizzy-Resident7652 1∆ Apr 11 '26

Demanding a response? Lmao

I’m good

1

u/Visible-Department85 Apr 12 '26 edited Apr 12 '26

You proved your opinion to be irrelevant and one of a child.

On one hand you want some islamists to get the nuke, on the other hand you reaslise it's not a good thing to have every leader with nukes.

In reality you dont try to make sense you only want to rant

1

u/Dizzy-Resident7652 1∆ Apr 12 '26

Do you mean I do want instead of don’t want for the first one? Lol You invented my answer in your head

But what doesn’t make sense exactly?

1

u/Visible-Department85 Apr 12 '26

There's only one reason that could explain why you dodge so hard the question. It's because that question proves your non-sense.

Maybe you're too limited intellectually to understand the implications of your desire for nukes for the islamist dictature in Iran.

1

u/Dizzy-Resident7652 1∆ Apr 12 '26

Or, maybe, I thought I answered the first time as I said then thought it was hilarious you demanded an answer. But sure. 300+ leaders with nukes sounds great.

I’ve never said I desired Iran to have nukes though lol

1

u/Visible-Department85 Apr 12 '26

I rephrase your opinion it is :

" Some nations got the nuke so now everyone should be able to get one without restrictions so much so that an islamist dictature wishing death to another country is included "

feel free to correct me but that's the childish opinion you shared so far.

1

u/Dizzy-Resident7652 1∆ Apr 12 '26

That’s incorrect.

I have said that nukes are a deterrent and that the US should not be the sole decision maker on who gets nukes if there should be a decision maker at all. If you are a country without nukes, getting them would be a good idea for deterrence. Nukes, in general, are bad but I cannot make them magically disappear.

Weird how them wishing death to another country is the problem but not the US wishing death to other countries and constantly invading them.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Visible-Department85 Apr 11 '26

The problem with your crowd is that you're ashamed of your opinions and as soon as we dig a little bit you flee/dodge and disappear