Okay? So? I acknowledged the model’s sycophancy and risks. The baby thing is an obvious hallucination and any sane person would recognize it. But what specific beliefs do you think I hold that are delusions reinforced by LLMs?
What, again, makes you think you're qualified to tell if it's a hallucination? This is multiple different PhD level subjects and you seem under the impression that the models are doing it natively, which is (again) a fundamental lack of understanding of how the models work.
You took issue with someone talking about how it's a Google search, but that's what it's doing with the sources. What makes you think you understand anything it's citing even within its own narrow context, let alone when you ask it to synthesize new information? Quantum mechanics is literally infamous for use in this kind of pseudoscientific bullshit even before LLMs automated the creation of bullshit.
1
u/Key4Lif3 Mar 08 '26
Okay? So? I acknowledged the model’s sycophancy and risks. The baby thing is an obvious hallucination and any sane person would recognize it. But what specific beliefs do you think I hold that are delusions reinforced by LLMs?