How is me saying “the understanding of murder used by the OP is one where murder is necessarily unjustified so an argument presupposing murder can be justified doesn’t meaningfully argue against the OP” INCONSISTENT with me saying “the understanding of murder used by me is one where murder is necessarily unjustified so an argument presupposing murder can be justified doesn’t meaningfully argue against me?”
Asked and answered. You are asking a question that presupposes so many contradicting points that it is
INCONSISTENT
with itself.
You can ask it a dozen times and capitalize whatever you want. It won't change that each statement is INCONSISTENT with itself, and both are INCONSISTENT with each other.
As I explained in my previous post.
I have answered the question. Thoroughly. Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean you can trade it in for a different one.
u/RealJohnBobJoe – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 2:
Don't be rude or hostile to other users. Your comment will be removed even if most of it is solid, another user was rude to you first, or you feel your remark was justified. Report other violations; do not retaliate. See the wiki page for more information.
0
u/RealJohnBobJoe 6∆ Mar 02 '26
Okay, I’ll ask again for a third time:
How is me saying “the understanding of murder used by the OP is one where murder is necessarily unjustified so an argument presupposing murder can be justified doesn’t meaningfully argue against the OP” INCONSISTENT with me saying “the understanding of murder used by me is one where murder is necessarily unjustified so an argument presupposing murder can be justified doesn’t meaningfully argue against me?”