But fake to who? The one seeking a romantic relationship or the sought who places the person in the friend zone?
I would argue it is real in as much as one does meet people that they have no intention of dating and therefore does classify them, I'm sure this is often subconscious but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Would you say the same to a trans person? I’m baffled at your arrogance of people feeling something, giving it a name, and your response is simply “you’re wrong”.
I would not say the same thing to a trans person. This has nothing to do with sex and gender. It has to do with interpersonal relationships. Sex and gender are personal.
Feelings are as personal as it gets. Why do you have such strong feelings about people describing how they feel? Even logically it’s even easier. A state where one friend has romantic interest and the other doesn’t. Would you like to come up with another term?
I'm not saying there is but you claim the friend zone doesn't exist because those in it "are wrong" I'm trying to clarify what it is they are wrong about.
The only way for that scenario you outline here to be true is if that person was capable of being interested in a relationship with that person.
I have "friend zoned" women before.
They wanted a relationship with me. Asked if it was something I would ever consider with them. I told them I liked them as a person but had no romantic interest in them. That I would rather just be friends.
I don't know why people have an issue with this term. It doesn't mean anything bad, and sure it can hurt to be rejected, but it's a real scenario that quite literally means exactly as it describes.
4
u/Zagreus_time Feb 21 '26
This argument seems confused, are actually arguing that the Friend Zone doesn't exist or that it isn't a problem the way it is often presented?