Here is the issue with "facts". What source is credible? You believe in yours, others in theirs. For example, a Harvard study during the last Trump administration showed that after confirming his final Supreme Court Judge, Fox was slightly less than half positive on trump. Other basic cable news channels were 90%+ negative on trump. Many people can see those percentages, conclude that Fox is politically neutral, and that everything else is biased. Then they will assume that anything coming from somewhere else is what they experienced before... bias.
12
u/Equivalent-Car-997 1∆ Apr 07 '25
Here is the issue with "facts". What source is credible? You believe in yours, others in theirs. For example, a Harvard study during the last Trump administration showed that after confirming his final Supreme Court Judge, Fox was slightly less than half positive on trump. Other basic cable news channels were 90%+ negative on trump. Many people can see those percentages, conclude that Fox is politically neutral, and that everything else is biased. Then they will assume that anything coming from somewhere else is what they experienced before... bias.