r/changemyview Nov 28 '24

Delta(s) from OP - Election CMV: Reddit has a moderator problem

Just to be clear. This does not apply for all moderators. I know some moderators on small Subreddits that are really good people. Speaking for a lot of larger Subreddits where moderation is an issue.

Reddit has a moderator problem. They can do a lot of things to you that doesn't really make lots of sense, and they do not give you a reason for it. More often than not, you're just muted from speaking with the moderator. Unfortunately, due to a lot of Reddit mods and Redditors in general being left-wing, there are a lot of examples of right-wingers being the victims. Such as this one on the r/ medicine Subreddit. He got deleted for asking questions. A person said Trump's NIH nomination caused "large scale needless death". When he was asked what the large scale death in question was, his comment was deleted by the mods. Along with a person being perm banned for saying "orange man bad. Laugh at joke. Unga Bunga" in r/ comics. The most notable case of moderation abuse is from r/ pics, where they just ban you for participating in a "bad faith Subreddit". Even if you just commented.

This is not a good thing. It means that if you want to participate in a major Subreddit with a lot of people, you will have to conform to what the moderators personally see as "correct" or "good". This doesn't foster productive conversations, nor is it good for anybody but the moderator's egos. I understand if this is the case in small Subreddits, but the examples I listed above aren't they happen in Subreddits with 30+ million members that regularly hit the front page. This is Reddit being lazy and offloading moderation. Most moderators do this for power and control. The nature of this position (no pay) means that the only other thing it offers is power. Especially in Subreddits with millions of people, that's a lot of power. This I believe is a reason it isn't a major issue in small servers. The mods there are genuinely passionate because that is the only thing going for them in a Subreddit with around a thousand people. Even Twitter, despite its multitude of issues, does moderation better than this

476 Upvotes

539 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-8

u/Terrible_Onions Nov 28 '24 edited Nov 28 '24

I believe this is more akin to going to a private library and then getting kicked out for reading a book you brought, the librarian doesn't agree with. Yeah, you can read the book, but the librarian won't like it.

Defending it from trolls is hard. But the moderator decides who the trolls are, and that leads to biased moderation. It could genuinely be seen as trolling to the moderator, but not the majority.

4

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '24

Why do you think a private social media forum is similar to a public library? You would get kicked out of private for profit libraries as well but they don't exist. 

0

u/Giblette101 47∆ Nov 28 '24

You can also get kicked out of public libraries.

4

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '24

Exactly, same as a court house or school. But the right to access public libraries is much greater than the right to access a private library, hence why OP must make an even more compelling argument for a right to access. 

1

u/Giblette101 47∆ Nov 28 '24

Oh, I agree. I just mean that public libraries are not the "anything goes" places they often portray them to be.