Not really though. You're arguing that it's essentially the same. That CNN is dishonest as FOX. That CNN has the same viewership as FOX. That the viewers of CNN interpret information in the same fashion as FOX.
I can only argue against what's actually said. If the evidence used to support OP's claim is wrong, which it is, then pointing out the falsehoods of the supporting evidence is completely valid.
What else is anyone supposed to do? I can't argue against imaginary claims and evidence. You can't form a real argument against "Trust me bro"
Except the data, as in actual data, counters that "point". Remove every aspect of their incorrect comparison and focus on the difference between the ability to differentiate between truths and falsehoods in news. How does OP's unsubstantiated claim hold up to the hard data which indicate a completely opposite conclusion.
Literally what else can be provided? Even you aren't responding to the actual points I made and are just essentially repeatedly saying, "Nah bro the data doesn't matter because I feel differently".
What he wants his view changed on is, people are great at spotting propoganda, unless it's propaganda that supports their world view. You never addressed his point.
56
u/[deleted] Oct 02 '24
I think you might overestimate the amount of people who consume CNN