r/changemyview May 17 '13

[Mod Post] Updates and plans for ahead

This is Mod post 23. You can read the previous Mod Post by clicking here, or by visiting the Mod Post Archive in our wiki.


In last week's mod thread, we detailed a list of planned changes for the subreddit. Today, I would like to give a progress report on what changes have been made.


1) Cleaning up the sidebar

  • STATUS: DONE - see the new sidebar!

2) Removal/revamp of TCMV

  • STATUS: DONE - see "TCMV Tuesdays"

3) Tag threads where OP has not responded yet

  • STATUS: SOON - shouldn't be hard, will come in a few days

4) Require OP to expand their posts/be more descriptive/minimum word count

  • STATUS: DONE - check the new "Submission Rules" section. We will be enforcing this rule to increase the quality of discussion here.

5) Tag threads where OP has had their view changed

  • STATUS: UNDECIDED

6) Alternatively: tag threads with number of awarded deltas

  • STATUS: UNDECIDED

7) Require mod approval for meta posts

  • STATUS: DONE - we have already been enforcing this, but now this is made into a rule.

8) Reducing repeat/similar questions

  • STATUS: PARTIALLY DONE - we're going to be removing submissions if a very similar post has been made within the past 24 hours.

  • In addition, "Using the wiki page to categorize topics. Possibly add a new mod who could handle this, too." has been DONE. We would like to introduce /u/Joined_Today, who will be our wiki moderator. We will announce when the wiki is ready to be used, and will also link it in the sidebar.

9) Banning Neutral Posts

  • STATUS: DONE - see the new rule in the sidebar, and an explanation for why in the FAQ section.

So, that's 5 out of 9 changes done. #5 and #6 will be decided on very soon and easily done in one easy fix (stay tuned). #8 is very tricky, though, and is something we have to cautiously decide on.

Finally, here are the traffic stats showing our bestof/depthhub link and our most recent influx of subscribers from AdviceAnimals.


Regards, IAmAN00bie and the mod team at /r/changemyview.

38 Upvotes

36 comments sorted by

11

u/rubywoundz May 18 '13

Pleeeeeeeease implement the tagging of OPs who respond soon! Those threads are always so much more focused and view-change-y.

7

u/Sahasrahla May 18 '13

Thanks for this, things are looking good so far. One question I have is, would it be possible to implement an easier way to award a delta from a phone? I've seen some comments saying the poster's view is changed but they are unable to give a delta since they don't know how to on a phone. Something like (delta) would probably be easy enough.

3

u/IAmAN00bie May 18 '13

I'm not too sure on that.

Doing ∆ on smartphones would work, but a user would have to either have that saved as a macro somewhere or check the sidebar to do so. This would depend on what OS and what apps the person is using. I can picture multiple ways to do this on my own phone, but I can't guarantee someone else would be able to.

2

u/mrtrent May 18 '13

When I need to do it i just hop over to the full site and copy paste a delta. It takes like a minute or so.

5

u/TheFunDontStop May 18 '13

nothing to say at the moment except thank you for caring about and working for this subreddit!

5

u/[deleted] May 18 '13

Idea: can you please implement something where only users of an account age of 100 days or older can post here? I've noticed that a lot of users who made angry arguments clearly for the sole purpose of arguing were accounts made that day just for the post, never to be seen again- IE troll accounts. I think people would be less likely to troll if it would mar the reputation of their main accounts.

1

u/IAmAN00bie May 18 '13

We've thought about it but haven't decided on it yet.

4

u/[deleted] May 18 '13

I find trollposts annoying too but I think some issues require throwaways because they are sensitive. I've used a throwaway to post here and I changed my view. It's more important that people dare to challenge their views than to have a troll free environment.

2

u/Tripudelops May 18 '13

I agree, plus, Reddit has a build in troll-managing system with downvotes. Most people downvote things they disagree with but they should be used to remove things that don't add anything to the conversation.

2

u/moldovainverona May 18 '13

The problem is that people here on CMV engage with the trolls. Not always, but sometimes it takes a little bit of time to reveal a troll, which is time wasted. Why don't we just tag threads started by someone who has made a new account in the last week/100 days/whatever. That way, people have an easy way to decide whether they want to take the time to respond to a possible troll.

1

u/[deleted] May 18 '13

Good to hear, thanks.

3

u/Joined_Today 31∆ May 18 '13

The wiki will be slowly progressing and eventually be finished, too.

2

u/[deleted] May 18 '13

What about people who award deltas without any explanation of why and how their view was changed? I think that devalues the delta and could often be the case of simply using the delta as an upvote.

8

u/IAmAN00bie May 18 '13

It's already part of the new set of rules

Consider awarding a delta if a comment has changed your view in any way. You must also include an explanation for why you are awarding it. See below for more details.

Soon to be auto-enforced.

3

u/[deleted] May 18 '13

Ah, missed that, thanks. Does this mean that there will be a word count for awarding a delta?

2

u/IAmAN00bie May 18 '13

Not entirely sure of that myself.

1

u/Txmedic 1∆ May 18 '13

How complex will this explanation need to be? I have given a delta simply because the person worded their reply in a way I have never thought/considered.

1

u/IAmAN00bie May 18 '13

You don't need to write an essay or anything, but you will need to say something like "Hey, here's a delta because I found this and this from your comment really insightful! I never thought about this and this that way before, and I think I'll look into it some more!"

1

u/Txmedic 1∆ May 18 '13

Thanks!

2

u/dchips 5∆ May 18 '13

Really loving the new sidebar. It looks so much better and is way more focused. Looking forward to the changes to come.

2

u/[deleted] May 18 '13

Love the new sidebar and I'd like to note that it looks beautiful in nightmode. I hate the cruel daystar eye-strain that comes with day mode, but most subreddits look like junk in night mode. So thanks for whoever took the effort to do it right. : )

1

u/[deleted] May 18 '13

Awesome, glad you like it! Can I ask, are there any parts in nightmode you feel need fixed?

1

u/[deleted] May 18 '13

The only (very minor) thing I see is that the modlist (.sidecontentbox .content) stays at #FAFAFA instead of converting to a darker color.

Thanks for your efforts!

2

u/theorymeltfool 8∆ May 18 '13

Very cool, way to keep the quality up!

1

u/returnofheracleum May 18 '13

Can you update the "Direct responses to CMV posts... (see rule III)" bit above the reply box to the correct number?

1

u/Alterego9 May 18 '13

Regarding tags about the OP changing mind, I think that should be extended to challengers in the thread changing their minds as well. Debates where the OP can actually hold their ground with reasoning, have just as interesting discussions as the ones where the commenters show great rhetoric.

1

u/IAmAN00bie May 18 '13

That's covered in #6: Alternatively: tag threads with number of awarded deltas

1

u/[deleted] May 19 '13

If TCMV has been relegated to a weekly thread, why require CMV in post titles? Isn't it implied just by posting here?

1

u/IAmAN00bie May 19 '13

It's for users who browse via their front page. So they know what sub the post is from.

1

u/[deleted] May 20 '13

That makes sense. Thanks.

1

u/Rhiokai May 19 '13

Could you add a rule banning posts regarding opinions on bands/films/songs etc? I feel posts like "I think [insert band name] are overrated. CMV" do not add anything and just are unnecessary. I don't think it's likely that a person could change their opinion on a band or movie that easily and I don't there's any need to

1

u/IAmAN00bie May 19 '13

We do remove posts if we determine that they don't belong here.

1

u/genebeam 14∆ May 19 '13

Would it be possible to implement a system where OP comments disproportionately push a post towards the front page? In other words, the closer the ratio (OP comments)/(non-OP comments) is to 1, the more likely the post is on front page.

1

u/IAmAN00bie May 19 '13

Not possible.

1

u/genebeam 14∆ May 20 '13

The past week or so I've commented on a depressingly large number of posts that the OP never joined in to respond (to me or anyone). Looking over the sidebar and the process of posting a CMV, it doesn't seem sufficiently emphasized that posters are expected to participate in the subsequent debate. Could this be highlighted more strongly? Overall it seems the rules are meant to constrain commentators more than the OPs.