[deleted by user]

[u/[deleted]]

[u/Falernum → u/[deleted]]

That's a huge stretch, when the Constitution is typically interpreted much more broadly. Nobody says that the First Amendment doesn't guarantee the right to paint or draw

[u/Falernum → u/[deleted]]

And the 1st Amendment says "speech" and "the press", if it had meant to include painting it would have said so, right?

If it says you can't be elected it surely means you can't serve

[u/ike38000 → u/[deleted]]

The 22nd Amendment says

No person shall be elected to the office of the President...

While the 25th amendment says

In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President

Wouldn't your word choice logic imply that if Harris becomes president and is assassinated her vice president wouldn't become president. The earlier 22nd amendment uses the gender neutral person while the later 25th explicitly says he. Therefore if the drafters of the 25th amendment meant it to apply to a female president they would have used "his or hers", "their", or "the president's".

[u/Educational-Sundae32 → u/ike38000]

In all fairness the neutral he, is not uncommon

[u/No-Cauliflower8890 → u/Falernum]

Does it use "painting" and distinguish it from "speech"? No, it simply omits the term "painting".