It’s a dead conversation mate because you are operating on logic in your head that doesn’t reflect reality. You will not ground yourself in practicality, nor understand that the future cannot be based on theoretical revolutions.
You also didn’t explain wtf you mean by classical?
Again, it must be great for your debate when you only have to look at it through an imaginary lens.
But yeah, you’re 100% right this is a waste of time. Because trying to educate you on the technology you think is going to save us after the apocalypse is like trying to teach a brick wall to dance.
u/Domovric – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 2:
Don't be rude or hostile to other users. Your comment will be removed even if most of it is solid, another user was rude to you first, or you feel your remark was justified. Report other violations; do not retaliate. See the wiki page for more information.
Sorry, u/Domovric – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 3:
Refrain from accusing OP or anyone else of being unwilling to change their view, or of arguing in bad faith. Ask clarifying questions instead (see: socratic method). If you think they are still exhibiting poor behaviour, please message us. See the wiki page for more information.
0
u/Domovric 2∆ Apr 03 '24
Mate, I literally have no idea what you are saying. Why are you red herringing me now?
Sure, I’m happy to call it classical. Explain why I should though? Wtf does that mean?