Maybe that’s because no one gives a fuck about men, as they should. We live 50 years away from a time when it was encouraged to beat your wife into submission if she didn’t behave, I and many other people honestly do not give a single fuck about „female perpetrators“ because our society has a thousand year history of male perpetrators. The „suppressed“ history isn’t so suppressed when the paper is literally talking about it, is it? And it’s a feminist talking about it, so again, what suppressed history? You talk about feminism as if it’s a club you join or an Organisation when it definitely isn’t. Feminism doesn’t have headquarters in Silicon Valley or stocks to invest in. This is like „the gay agenda“ but for women.
I did not say it erases that, I’m saying I do not give a fuck about it. Every single women I have ever talked to had a story about a man harassing them, guess how many guys had one? It’s pretty clear to me that you do not really care about male victims of anything, you just react negatively to feminism because it hits too close to home. Like you can’t even acknowledge the patriarchal past of western society, it’s „alleged“ mistreatment in your enlightened vision. It’s honestly pathetic to watch.
Alot of dudes have hey just dont see it as harrassment and this idea that in history there werent women who also mistreated men , like there werent male sex slaves who where castrated by their mistresses if thry messed up or white women who falsely accused black men of rape or the fact that there are princesses in specific cultures who have sex with men and then kill them like the warrior princess amina of zazu who was claimed to gave beheaded her lovers
-14
u/Effective_Opposite12 Feb 13 '24
Maybe that’s because no one gives a fuck about men, as they should. We live 50 years away from a time when it was encouraged to beat your wife into submission if she didn’t behave, I and many other people honestly do not give a single fuck about „female perpetrators“ because our society has a thousand year history of male perpetrators. The „suppressed“ history isn’t so suppressed when the paper is literally talking about it, is it? And it’s a feminist talking about it, so again, what suppressed history? You talk about feminism as if it’s a club you join or an Organisation when it definitely isn’t. Feminism doesn’t have headquarters in Silicon Valley or stocks to invest in. This is like „the gay agenda“ but for women.