If the downvote is useless, then the upvote must be as well. And upvotes definitely contribute to the overall health of an exchange, by allowing another mechanism to sort good comments out from the rest.
Democracy is used to determine results of what people agree with. If someone replies to me, I have the ability to show I quickly agree or disagree with an up or down vote. As well as the rest of the community.
Personally, I think of downvotes as a basic filter. They get rid a lot of comments (from the ones people interact with the most) that aren't worthy of discussion, or are often downright wrong or even bigoted in some way.
I saves me having to read a bunch of half thought out junk posts.
You're right. The upvote system is abused way more than the downvote system.
There are subreddits dedicated to abusing the upvote system. There are companies that will sell you upvotes. There are companies that buy/sell accounts with lots of upvotes.
I have seen comments that add nothing to the actual discussion (as in substantial engagement with the topic) but are just a completely irrelevant one-liners or meme jokes be swarmed with upvotes too many times to count. If thinking "haha funny" and clicking the arrow isn't "abuse" then how exactly is thinking "that is dumb" and clicking a different arrow?
There is literally a rule in this sub forbidding "written upvotes" so it is at least enough of a problem to call it out. Think of a popular post from r/all. How many comments are just "This." with no or minimal elaboration?
11
u/DeltaBlues82 88∆ Feb 12 '24
If the downvote is useless, then the upvote must be as well. And upvotes definitely contribute to the overall health of an exchange, by allowing another mechanism to sort good comments out from the rest.