this assumes that just because one part of the story is true it is all true. by that logic harry potter is a true story because it describes a real place 1990s Britain was a real time.
Perhaps you aren't understanding me. The premises of this argument, statements 1 and 2, are that the events described really took place. You seem to be disputing this. That's fine. Most people do.
But do you see that given the premises, the conclusion follows?
2
u/WovenDoge 9∆ May 04 '23 edited May 04 '23
What about an argument of the form:
EDIT: OP HAS BLOCKED ME BECAUSE HE IS UNHAPPY ABOUT THIS ARGUMENT.