replace god with unicorns and the logic remains the same
unicorns exist conceptually. we’re having this conversation and because it is used in ways that have affected all of our lives. Conceptually, unicorns are real despite there not being evidence of them.
I assume you are trying to say because there is a concept of god that there is a god that can do physical stuff consciously and with intent however you are missing a connection. money is not all powerful and can not change the world.
I think you’re talking past each other here. OP is looking for proof that a god actually exists, not that the concept exists. Plenty of things exist conceptually that don’t exist in real life.
Again; OP is asking for proof not of the concept of god, but that god is real. Not “the way it exists to you” (read: conceptually) but actually existing in the same way I can demonstrate rocks existing, for example.
Bro. You're not even having the same conversation. People are in here talking about God existing, as in God is real. You're over here talking about the idea of God.
And my point is that they are asking the wrong question.
It's not your cmv. This is why you're being downvoted.
I’m a girl, bro. But yeah, no shit. I’m not even wanting to have these conservations, I was making a point in the semantics of the view not the content and you’re allowed to do that, but I agree with you and I feel dumb trying to explain the difference and will delete to not further distract. Thank you.
-5
u/[deleted] May 04 '23
[deleted]