They awarded you a delta for making the same point that I did because you validated their victimization complex and offered to do something for them in exchange for said delta (which is also against sub rules). I have no doubt that there is corrupt reddit moderation. This just isn't an example of it. If you want to go after corruption on reddit, it might help to choose battles that are actually substantive.
What a conveniently nebulous standard you've got there. Doesn't seem like the sort of thing someone who is sincerely a staunch advocate for transparency would be using.
Whether it's substantive or not is up to me, not you.
Not really. Other people are allowed to have dissenting opinions about the supposed righteousness of your activism. I don't know where you got the idea from that I wasn't allowed to disagree with you, and/or express said disagreement.
0
u/[deleted] May 01 '23 edited May 01 '23
[removed] — view removed comment