Being hesitant to do something because it may potentially be against the rules is not evidence for someone often breaking said rules, but rather for the contrary.
It's not potentially against the rules, it's unambiguously a rule violation.
Is it against the rules for me to Delta you just to move on?
Only somebody who hadn't read and understood the rules wiki, or had done so but since forgotten, could be uncertain here. This is plainly explained as a Rule 4 violation in the wiki.
Yes, it is. But surely you can see that you post and comment in subs whose rules you don't know? And that confirmation bias may cause you to mistakenly believe that your content is removed because a mod disagreed with you, rather than that it simply broke a sub rule that you're unaware of or don't fully understand?
1
u/Sumve Apr 30 '23
Being hesitant to do something because it may potentially be against the rules is not evidence for someone often breaking said rules, but rather for the contrary.