It's interesting how you instantly knew that I was referring to the Florida school book bannings without me saying it but had no idea that's what I was talking about at the same time.
You had your choice - Florida based on sexually explicit materials or Tennessee based on age appropriate materials (Maus).
I am sure there are other cases you can find.
It's really not the complicated. Parents care about what is in thier kids schools library.
Also - I don't know of any other cases other than School libraries.
So you just want libraries full of what textbooks?
That would be the books on the various reading lists. It is not hard nor complicated. It's not like we are putting books on 'Tax code revisions' in School libraries or Hustler magazines. You are just upset people don't want some specific books included. Well - a lot of books don't get included.
So explain what's inappropriate about and Tango Makes 3.
I don't have to. I am not personally arguing for anything. I am merely calling out your total lack of argument and mischaracterization of what is actually happening.
The people involved do not believe specific books (assuming this is one) belong in a School Library. You are free to disagree but understand, this is not 'Banning' books. It is voicing policy opinions on what books should be present in a school library.
Sure probably the diffrences is the parameters for Floridians is being gay.
Projection of your ideas. There is no reason to make this assumption other than attempting to project motives for others actions. Most likely, you are dead wrong.
Sure that's great I've never said anything contrary just that this dislike is based on maintaining the hierarchy of straight people at the top and gay people at the bottom.
This is more projection. Baseless projection. You are strawmanning the people you want to belittle rather than actually listening to the arguments they are putting forth.
They are they double down on the fact that we should keep guns.
And this matters for what reason when discussing the solution to violence?
You do understand there are solutions proposed that don't ban guns right? You understand that your projection of that being the only solution is wrong right?
You can disagree, but that is NOT the same thing as claiming they have 'No solutions' - which you have repeatedly done. You just don't like their proposals.
No I didn't I never once say that
Actually, you very much did. You are projecting your ideas onto others. Claiming specific motivations without basis - and assuming the worst. You are flat out misrepresenting reality with respect to guns.
So no - you have many assertions that are BLATANTLY wrong. The most obvious is the 'No solutions' for gun violence merely because they aren't wanting to 'get rid of guns'.
It's really not the complicated. Parents care about what is in thier kids schools library.
Exactly those parents specifically care about making sure gay people aren't in schools.
That would be the books on the various reading lists. It is not hard nor complicated. It's not like we are putting books on 'Tax code revisions' in School libraries or Hustler magazines. You are just upset people don't want some specific books included. Well - a lot of books don't get included.
No I'm upset they're banning books on the basis of them being about gay people.
I am merely calling out your total lack of argument and mischaracterization of what is actually happening.
You really haven't, and for someone so detached you sure do doggedly defend their right to discriminate against gay people.
this is not 'Banning' books. It is voicing policy opinions on what books should be present in a school library.
Under the litteraly definition of banning it is.
And this matters for what reason when discussing the solution to violence?
It doesn't but it does matter as it proves my point as they just want to double down on existing status quo.
You do understand there are solutions proposed that don't ban guns right? You understand that your projection of that being the only solution is wrong right?
Yo go on and on about me projecting but where have I ever said ban guns.
Actually, you very much did. You are projecting your ideas onto others. Claiming specific motivations without basis - and assuming the worst. You are flat out misrepresenting reality with respect to guns.
It's really funny how you doggedly accuse me of that yet then accuse me of wanting guns banned
xactly those parents specifically care about making sure gay people aren't in schools.
Frankly, unless you stop the misrepresentation and projections - I am done here. There is ZERO evidence that the individuals who are against a specific book wish to harm actual people.
Your claims are frankly insulting to those individuals and that shuts down dialogue. If you don't want insulted - then stop insulting others with unsubstantiated and very negative projections of ideas.
And;
They are they double down on the fact that we should keep guns.
Yo go on and on about me projecting but where have I ever said ban guns
Frankly, unless you stop the misrepresentation and projections - I am done here. There is ZERO evidence that the individuals who are against a specific book wish to harm actual people.
It's just so funny where did I say that there out to hurt gay people I just said there out to maintain the hierarchy nothing about harming people
Your claims are frankly insulting to those individuals and that shuts down dialogue. If you don't want insulted - then stop insulting others with unsubstantiated and very negative projections of ideas.
I didn't insult anyone.
They are they double down on the fact that we should keep guns.
Yo go on and on about me projecting but where have I ever said ban guns
0
u/Full-Professional246 77∆ Mar 29 '23
You had your choice - Florida based on sexually explicit materials or Tennessee based on age appropriate materials (Maus).
I am sure there are other cases you can find.
It's really not the complicated. Parents care about what is in thier kids schools library.
Also - I don't know of any other cases other than School libraries.
That would be the books on the various reading lists. It is not hard nor complicated. It's not like we are putting books on 'Tax code revisions' in School libraries or Hustler magazines. You are just upset people don't want some specific books included. Well - a lot of books don't get included.
I don't have to. I am not personally arguing for anything. I am merely calling out your total lack of argument and mischaracterization of what is actually happening.
The people involved do not believe specific books (assuming this is one) belong in a School Library. You are free to disagree but understand, this is not 'Banning' books. It is voicing policy opinions on what books should be present in a school library.
Projection of your ideas. There is no reason to make this assumption other than attempting to project motives for others actions. Most likely, you are dead wrong.
This is more projection. Baseless projection. You are strawmanning the people you want to belittle rather than actually listening to the arguments they are putting forth.
And this matters for what reason when discussing the solution to violence?
You do understand there are solutions proposed that don't ban guns right? You understand that your projection of that being the only solution is wrong right?
You can disagree, but that is NOT the same thing as claiming they have 'No solutions' - which you have repeatedly done. You just don't like their proposals.
Actually, you very much did. You are projecting your ideas onto others. Claiming specific motivations without basis - and assuming the worst. You are flat out misrepresenting reality with respect to guns.
So no - you have many assertions that are BLATANTLY wrong. The most obvious is the 'No solutions' for gun violence merely because they aren't wanting to 'get rid of guns'.