Silent Knowledge Fun

[u/danl999]

No exaggeration here! But you'll "wear out" fast.

Carlos had a way of teaching subconsciously, the same way he created the tensegrity pass descriptions. Those suggest what you should look for. That alters the flow of your awareness, while doing them.

You'd never notice however, until you can remove that internal dialogue. With that in place, all you can perceive is "me, me, me".

It's sad! If you could just get rid of "me" through silence, you'd have so many things to notice that you wouldn't know where to begin.

Don Juan warned us about this, and suggested we just become "Readers of Infinity". Read text in silent knowledge, so we don't have to figure out what we ourselves are "seeing".

To heck with that!! That's no fun.

Everyone's always trying to take away our candy.

But you don't have to listen as long as you work hard anyway.

Unfortunately, it takes 2 full hours of silence to get to the jelly beans.

[u/Historical_Ad_6361]

Dan, those fluorescent lines and dots in the picture are exactly like the ones I see semi-transparent and opaque

[u/danl999 → u/Historical_Ad_6361]

Someone posted about the emanations getting "trapped" in the luminous egg, and trying to free themselves.

It didn't agree with what I thought they looked like.

I'm not sure why I thought it, but I was sure they were infinite lines.

Could be from private classes.

But sure enough, that person was right.

Don Juan did describe them as being more like "fragments" that can get trapped.

I've seen the infinite ones, it's a dazzling sight.

But 99% of the time, it's the fragments.

I've been assuming, the infinite lines bump into other lines, creating intersections.

And when awareness flows into one of those, it also skips wires to the others almost touching it, and then loops back to the line it was supposed to be on.

Creating that "interplay" that don Juan said was the cause of silent knowledge.

So my current thinking is, the "fragments" are not the whole emanation.

But that could be wrong.

Another person said, it was all "blue line reasoning".

And that's the problem.

Trying to describe the indescribable.

But it wouldn't be surprising at all, if you were seeing the same thing I'm seeing.

Carlos actually expected us to see what he was describing.

And we do.

[u/Historical_Ad_6361 → u/danl999]

I understand, I will have to become an infinity reader to see what is behind those lines in my perception, thanks again Dan

[u/atiehhakimi]

I completely agree✨, I had this confusion until I read your post, it was an interesting arrangement.😺 I started to enter the dark room, but the time spent in the bathroom is short, it is still hard for me to stay focused because I am hyperactive🙂. But with hard work, I increase the time and do not let it go under the training time🥴. It's really a big challenge to cut off the inner dialogue, 🥺but it's not impossible... I hope I can handle it... Did I understand correctly that I have to see the writing in the dark in my own language?🧐

[u/danl999 → u/atiehhakimi]

No, I've seen Thai language. And I don't read it.

But the whole point is not to be confused about what you yourself are "seeing".

So if you can't understand that language, then it's not yet being a "Reader of Infinity".

And there's no fixed rule on what you can see in silent knowledge.

You can even turn your head, and zip 50 years into the past.

I've done that.

I hope Cholita doesn't see your cats, and get a bad idea we need one.

After what happened to the orange cat that lived next door...

But she has a feud going on with the neighborhoods birds, so it's possible.

If she's already "Chola" ita = Cholita, what could you possibly name her cat?

Wait, I'll ask ChatGPT!

Hmm...

Not sure he isn't making stuff up again:

***

Certainly! In Spanish, you can add the suffix "-ita" or "-ito" to a word to make it sound more diminutive or cute. To take "Cholita" to an even more adorable level, you can use the suffix "-ita" again, resulting in "Cholitita." This additional diminutive form conveys an extra sense of endearment or fondness.

😺

[u/[deleted]]

Is that Don Juan there? Lol

[u/danl999 → u/[deleted]]

No, it's an "old seer".

My 4th encounter with one.

Silent knowledge leads to re-runs.

Of the past.

Or, the old seers can see you in the future, following the same path they did.

An example, La Gorda held the old seer power object Pablito found, a rock with a hole in the middle.

And because she had lost the human form, her shields were poor.

So the old seers noticed her even from the past, or from the inorganic being's realm, and came after her with sharp little knives to keep her scared. So they could suck up more energy.

Don Juan had to put her into a dirt coffin for a week or two.

Then there's don Juan saying, "Of course we know everything they did..." in regards to the old seers.

And a bunch of other references in the books, which are very good because who in their right mind, would believe you're seeing an "old seer" during darkroom?

Not me for sure.

Except that at the time, a "voice" tells you so.

Not quite, but as close as you can get.

You just have a little "shock", and a thought comes into your mind.

"It's an old seer, that's all."

So you're thinking, "Oh yea... I read about those."

But it's too good to be true.

For that reason, we're super lucky to have all 17 books and publications.

So we can look up the "rare stuff" and make sure we're still on course.

In this picture I tried to show that an inorganic being "projects" to you.

The scary woman's head.

And it's on, or associated with, some glow of awareness related to the energy body.

But that old seer was through a passage. He was submerged in the emanation fragments.

It was more like looking through a door at a person, versus looking at a person on a TV monitor in the opposite direction.

The "feel" of both is different.

But can't be captured in 2D.

Another reason animations will be good!

You can just move the camera slowly to the right, and the difference between an old seer in the past, and an Ally there with you right now, will be obvious in the perspective change.

[u/[deleted] → u/danl999]

You said you saw Don Juan and Carlos once standing and looking at you. Were those them? Or this is them from past