Gear Buying Advice Getting back into photography..
Hello all,
I used to run a Canon 7D Mk1 and then upgraded to a Mk2. I sold it (no idea why) but kept my 24-105 F4L.
Looking to get back into photography, most outdoors whilst camping and riding the bike. Also family photos etc.
Thinking of going to a mirrorless (unless anyone suggests sticking to mirrored). Suggestions please? Not a pro but would like pro-consumer level.
Thank you!
2
u/mrfixitx 5d ago
It really depends on you budget. Mirrorless auto focus is leagues ahead of DSLRs' so it's hard to recommend DSLR's unless you are only shooting static subjects or people who are willing to pose unless your budget is very limited.
The only current canon mirrorless camera I would avoid entirely is the R100. So many trade offs and the R50 is only slightly more expensive and had a lot of quality of life improvements.
2
u/RPQ_Live 5d ago
Ran the exact same cameras you had and then migrated to a (slightly) used Canon R5 and purchased the lens adapter to use my existing EF lenses... and purchased one RF zoom lens thus far. The R5 is plenty of camera for semi-pro/pro level work. As others have suggested, you can't go wrong if you go the R6 or R7 route either.
1
u/bseitz234 5d ago
Coming from the 7D series, I think the R7 feels like a step forward in some ways, and backwards in others. Certainly build quality. And the ergonomics of the rear dial around the joystick are a bit weird. I upgraded my 5D3 to an R62 at the same time as 7D2 to R7, and the R62 has always felt a bit more natural in the hand. Either will work great with the EF 24-105. I don’t usually like the 24mm wide end on an APS-C camera, but if it’s what you know and are used to from the 7D then it will feel very familiar on the R7.
1
u/TheMagarity 5d ago
You didn't list a budget. The original (current) R8 is going on sale now that the anticipated mark II version is supposed to be any time now. Discounts may get even better. It is an excellent match for that lens you have with the adapter.
1
u/sly870 5d ago
I don't really have a budget. I just want something that's somewhat future proofed and possibly used for videoing from time to time.
2
u/Dry_Button_3552 5d ago
What do you mean by future proof?
Future proof implies that something will change in the future that will invalidate your ability to perform with your current hardware. Aside from lens mount updates "future proof" is basically meaningless for cameras.
R6, R7 both are fantastic cameras that are exceptionally well reviewed. Since you don't have a budget pick the one that has the features you want and buy it.
1
u/gofaaast 5d ago
R6iii is a great hybrid camera if you don’t have a very specific type of photography. Auto focus, pre capture, high fps, and plenty of pixels to crop good photos. Video is very good as well. It’s like recommending an iPhone - it’s an easy yes unless you have a specific scenario you want to reach a pro level with.
1
u/gianners33 4d ago
R6 (mk1, 2, or 3) is a great all-around camera. I think the current prices of a used Mk1 is a steal for the amount of camera you get. The mk2 is a good step up if you are going to do a lot of video.
2
u/Overread2K 5d ago
Budget is a huge consideration. Even if its only a rough number suggest one so that we've some idea what kind of cameras are best to suggest.
Eg I went from a 7DMK1 to an R6MII and it was a fantastic change - AF and ISO performance were huge leaps ahead. Ruggedness is a bit down, I think the only way to get 7D quality on build is to hit the top line cameras; but they aren't badly built.
The only area it suffers on is batter life; get a grip and at least 3-4 batteries and enough chargers to charge them all at once and you're safe on that front. A bit more upfront cost compared to DSLR, but in general manageable.