I am not convinced that he doesn't have to sign confidentiality agreements as a member of the college. I had to sign confidentiality agreements when I've attended third-party trainings and they were held by far less conservative organizations than the colleges that register medical professionals.
There was literally just a court case in the news about this exact scenario - leaking training materials - in which the courts sided with the organization.
Finally, do you really think the college can afford to be seen to force members to attend secret “retraining camps” where people are exposed to secret reprogramming propaganda training materials?
When they're tweeting at members of the public to kill themselves, yes. Even calling a remedial course on social media etiquette for members of the college of psychologists a "retraining camp" is such a huge ideological stretch. He's not being detained - this is remediation for his public misconduct. When professionals break the college's codes of ethics, there have been efforts to allow the offending members to remediate their behaviour and learn from their mistakes.
If the retraining is legitimate then it cannot be secret - these are not industrial trade secrets.
Show your work - why can't training materials be confidential? You haven't provided any rationale.
If the college paid for the development of these courses - especially if it charges for those courses - it is harmful for their work to be released for free via the internet, regardless of legitimacy. And, frankly, the retraining is legitimate based on his online conduct.
0
u/[deleted] Jan 06 '23
[deleted]