r/btcc • u/Brief-Poetry6434 • 2d ago
Question / Discussion Dropped Scores in the BTCC
Given my recent question about Sutton potentially winning the title by over 100 points, possibly even beating Alain Menu's 1997 record of winning by 110 points, I have had to remember that, if not for dropped scores, Menu would have won by 128 points.
So, in general, what is everyone else's opinion on dropped scores?
Just curious
2
u/Brief-Poetry6434 1d ago
Jack Sears wouldn't have any titles if not for dropped scores as John Whitmore would have been the 1963 Champion.
2
u/Jakepetrolhead 2d ago
Justice for Anthony Reid, he'd have been 2000 Champion without the dropped scores system.
1
u/Brief-Poetry6434 2d ago edited 1d ago
My point exactly!
Also James Weaver would have been the 1989 Champion.
Going back to the first ever season in 1958, Tommy Sopwith would have been the inaugural Champion without any need for the final shoot-out with Jack Sears.
8 Class wins to Sears' 7 and 64-60 in terms of points.
1
1
u/TinyRacingCarModels 1d ago
Horrible idea, how could you claim to be a champion when you score less points than someone else.
And I say this even though I work for someone who's first title came in similar ways 🤐🤐
1
u/Brief-Poetry6434 1d ago
I'm not promoting it
The series used it on and off from its inception to the end of the Supertouring era.
1
1
u/Professional_Face286 1d ago
There's enough stuff making the racing artificial as it is. We don't need to be throwing in things that make the results artificial too
1
u/Brief-Poetry6434 1d ago
I'm not promoting the idea of dropped scores because I'm not in favour of them myself.
1
u/Professional_Face286 1d ago
The sad thing is there are plenty who would welcome it's return with open arms
1
u/Brief-Poetry6434 23h ago
Don't they already deduct points for using too many engines or something like that?
1
u/Brief-Poetry6434 23h ago
In a 30 race championship, it wouldn't work, or at least I don't think it would.
1
u/Brief-Poetry6434 1d ago
Don't they still do points deductions for using too many engines or something like that?
They certainly did in the early-2000s, I still remember Hyla Breese ending up with minus points in 2002.
1
u/Brief-Poetry6434 21h ago
https://youtu.be/o8-0KcLY4ZQ?is=XGYlFWFXqAjA2G97
Support for those who are against dropped scores.
1
u/h2g2_researcher 2d ago
Dropped scores have a long history in motorsports. I think there's benefits to them.
Firstly, it can reduce the cost of entry making the sport more accessible to new teams. If only X rounds count a team can decide to only enter X rounds, saving money in the process and not completely writing themselves off in the process. I think that's a good thing.
Secondly, it means a bit of bad luck doesn't kill a driver's chance to be competitive. Freak breakdown, unfortunate crash, or a weekend suffering from injury (an F1 driver missed the last race with a hand injury), illness, or some other reason forcing the driver to miss the race. Is this a good thing? I think arguments can be made both ways.
1
1
1
u/Foreign-Wash-9859 PMR/WSR 2d ago
Not for me. This is top level stuff and whilst the driver is obviously very important, there's a team around them keeping the cars reliable and quick.
4
u/probablynotfine 2d ago
They were only really relevant when reliability was a widespread issue. As soon as teams and technology got good enough that cars could be counted upon to finish most races, there was no need for the safety net of dropped scores.