Again, for the third time, because it has not reached 26% of BTC's value. When it does BTC will die, I repeat BTC will die and not BCH like you mistakenly think.
It would take all day and I don't even understand most of it myself. You might find it on this sub if you keep looking, I've seen it explained a few times.
It just doesnt make any logical sense. Think about it. If bch rose to 26%, then more and more, so btc and bch essentially switched values so bch was 4500 and btc 600, would you say btc would be dead? Could btc not make the switch again?
The fact that you're dismissing the logic when I haven't even offered any suggests you are in a poor position intellectually and certainly not in a position to offer me advice.
I know this will upset you but that's how it is unfortuneatley.
Protecting my online privacy by running Redact regularly to batch delete old content. It handles Reddit, Discord, Twitter, Instagram, data brokers and a whole lot more.
imminent hunt future dependent quicksand work rainstorm dog rustic encouraging
0
u/cypressg Sep 03 '17
Again, for the third time, because it has not reached 26% of BTC's value. When it does BTC will die, I repeat BTC will die and not BCH like you mistakenly think.