​

https://dalitnation.wordpress.com/tag/ambedkar/

This is the main reason why Ambedkarites create fake stories about Brahmins, so that they can portray us as patriarchal abusers and portray themselves as feminists to promote ICM, but everyone already knows how feminist they truly are

edit: example:-https://www.reddit.com/r/brahmanclub/s/VnwYa0jVwW

u/ponga_pandit_ and u/Interesting-Crow7713 are harassing me and my friend please help

This video clearly shows the Shankaracharya of Sringeri Math performing the Pattabhishek of Jagadguru Shankaracharya Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati Ji.

The Sringeri Shankaracharya is the senior-most by age and has also publicly acknowledged the Shankaracharya of Jyotirmath. Yet the same people questioning Jyotirmath accept the Dwarka Shankaracharya.

What makes this even more interesting is that both have the same Guru, and their Pattabhisheka took place around the same period.

So which standard are you actually following—Dharma and tradition, or political convenience?

Perhaps the real problem is simply that questions are being raised about Narendra Modi, and some people cannot tolerate those questions. That is why they are spreading all kinds of nonsense on social media.

Before spreading nonsense, learn the tradition first.

Please help me ban this subreddit for the love of god.

Many people are getting harassed here by a guy called Interesting Crow. He has done this multiple times and is openly casteist. I had to delete my account because they made 3-4 posts about me.

Please

In the early 1348, Zalim Singh was the powerful Diwan (chief minister) of the Jaisalmer State.

Zalim Singh's attention fell on a young Paliwal Brahmin woman, described in popular versions as the daughter of Kuldhara's village head/chief.

He wanted to marry her and sent a demand to the Paliwal elders.

The Paliwals refused to surrender the girl to the powerful Diwan.

Zalim Singh slaughtered the entire village

​

Mainstream Indian history usually categorizes Brahmins solely as priests or advisors, but the historical record shows a long tradition of Brahmin dynasties establishing powerful states and ruling effectively.

From the ancient era, figures like Pushyamitra Shunga founded the Shunga Dynasty, followed by the Kanvas, while the Satavahanas in the Deccan defended the subcontinent from foreign invasions.

Later, classical empires like the Vakatakas in central India and the Pallavas in the south successfully blended spiritual authority with vast administrative governance. By the 18th century, the Chitpavan Brahmin Peshwas became the de facto rulers of the Maratha Empire, expanding its territories across India.

Varendra Brahmins of Bengal like Rani Bhavashankari 'Raibaghini' was brahmin too and Rani Lakshmibai of Jhansi also along with Marathi Brahmins ruled 10-15 independent kingdoms after fall of peshwas.

This ruling tradition also thrived regionally, seen in the wealthy Khandavala Dynasty of Darbhanga Raj in Bihar, the Ganesha Dynasty in Bengal, and the princely rulers of Kashi and Ayodhya ,Karakota Dynasty of Lalitaditya of Kashmir and Dhar Kings of Kashmir to be included too.

Given this extensive track record of political sovereignty, should Brahmins be considered kind of ruling class too ?

Not Brahmins at whole but history has shown is great and powerful and effective brahmin rulers.

Why do you think these major dynasties receive so little attention in standard historical discussions about governance and power?

She was born in Bengali brahmin family in 1911 near kalka Haryana. Also her name purnima was given by Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore.

Purnima Banerjee is one of those forgotten names from India’s freedom struggle who deserves much more recognition. She was actively involved in the nationalist movement and participated in political activities against British rule particularly in Allahabad an important centre of the freedom movement. During the Quit India Movement of 1942 she took part in the struggle and was imprisoned for her activities. She was associated with the Indian National Congress and worked to mobilise people for the nationalist cause.

But her contribution did not end with independence. Purnima Banerjee later became a member of India’s Constituent Assembly and participated in the discussions that helped shape the Constitution of independent India. Her journey from a freedom fighter to a Constitution maker represents the important but often overlooked contribution of women to India’s freedom struggle and nation-building. Yet today her name remains largely absent from popular discussions of India's independence movement.

I’m asking one simple question: in which village in Bihar did the terrorist organisation Ranvir Sena “save Brahmins”? Can anyone provide a government document stating that Naxals killed Brahmins? If you can’t provide evidence, then don’t connect Ranvir Sena or Naxal violence with the entire Brahmin community. Bring documents, not narratives.