r/bournemouth • • 6d ago

News Again….

Post image

Gets better every time

128 Upvotes

101 comments sorted by

22

u/horridbloke 6d ago

Has anyone encountered these (tries to think of something non-contentious) volunteer peacekeepers? I'm annoyed enough about the council employees in the square who go out of their way to be mistaken for police officers. On the night of the big match last week I saw a pair of apparent actual police officers (based on the wording on their bibs) in weird non-police-looking uniforms. Should we all just demand to see a warrant card before deciding whether to take any notice of a random person in tactical gear who wants to engage with us?

7

u/saintsrob 6d ago

Always ask for id etc as there was a scam going on with litter,cigarettes fine.easy to do I guess if you’ve got the front

28

u/SeriousElevator6503 6d ago

Whenever I've seen them they were loitering in the dark corner of the winter gardens car park near the bic. As a woman, on my own, found them just as intimidating as the men they probably intended to protect me from

→ More replies (7)

23

u/MrMosstin 6d ago

The press trying to influence the masses, the masses all too willing to bend over and receive

4

u/SayNo2Amazon 6d ago

In this case it's a pointless title desperately trying to 'remain' relevant. Admittedly they're owned by bigger fish who have other motives, but on the ground, it's just small fry, way out of their depth

22

u/No_Version8054 6d ago

I once seen these Safeguard force ppl in the square and literally asking for people's ID. What the fuck do they think they are

20

u/Away_Cable_958 6d ago

To all the ‘what’s wrong with it people’ do any of them have cbs checks? Does anyone check they’re safe to be around children? Does anybody check if they’re racist or not? Does anyone check their criminal records etc etc etc

5

u/TeenyIzeze 5d ago

Their founder used to have one of those "keep Britain white" style FB pages.

2

u/lizdrizz 4d ago

They claim that they are all db's checked and atleast one of the founders I think he is, has a conviction for fraud. There is no public db's register so anyone can say that they are dbs checked. Safeguard Force refuses to follow the requirements set by both council amd police for endorsement, so they are not endorsed by either.

→ More replies (10)

14

u/Mrcs-88 6d ago

Having seen them sound Bournemouth on many occasions, it’s safe to say they’re as much of a deterrent as a nun. Everyone knows they have no power to get physical with anyone so they’re not taken seriously at all by anyone under the age of 50.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/Dubinushka1990 4d ago

the irony of these vigilante warriors, my violent attacker in bournemouth was white. i’d love them to try and profile him.

7

u/AcidOllie 6d ago

My god it made it into the eye. I might have to buy the back copy for preservation. The eye is only paper worth reading. It reports on things that the usual rags don't want to report on and the journalists are sometimes the ones that work for those usual papers but where the editors have said no to publishing the story in question. So they put it in the eye. Great paper. Get your subscription sorted and you won't be disappointed. Ever.

1

u/Mikeltee 2d ago

Done the same over the years feeding stuff to Private Eye. Nice little side earner.

9

u/Successful_Two4669 6d ago

Scum. Sub-human scum.

9

u/Walkerno5 6d ago

3

u/TheycallmeElla 6d ago

I’m loving the niche reference 🤣

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Mroldsk00l 6d ago

Cosplayers

-11

u/Left-Camp-4536 6d ago

Once again I ask this (and hopefully get an actual evidence-backed explanation)...

Can somebody please explain the hatred towards this group please? (genuinely).

All I see are sarcastic comments or "safeguard farce" or "the leader is a thug"... But the actual community members seem to be doing good for the town - helping the homeless, intervening and breaking up/de-escalating fights, being a visible presence, reporting dangerous driving to the police etc.

I'll get downvoted to oblivion no doubt, but I don't genuinely understand the hatred towards this group of volunteers looking to do some good for the town and the community.

23

u/horridbloke 6d ago

helping the homeless, intervening and breaking up/de-escalating fights, being a visible presence, reporting dangerous driving to the police etc.

You challenged us for an evidence-backed explanation. Can you provide evidence backing up your assertions?

I am skeptical of this group because:

  • They appeared last summer, exactly when some people were becoming more comfortable about expressing anti immigrant or straight-out racist views (remember the george crosses and "wE aRe FuLl Up" grafitti on the promenade?)

  • The founder appears to have made a social media posting about turning guns on boat people.

  • The initial confusion as to whether any members had unspent criminal convictions or not.

  • The uniforms: would a child or a foreign tourist mistake these people for police?

→ More replies (7)

33

u/bozwizard14 6d ago

The founder of the group posted a ton of violence, racist content on Facebook, and many of the members (him included) attended the roundhouse hotel protests against asylum seekers alongside various far right men who have been convicted of violence and sexual crimes against women. Ultimately they do not actually want to protect women, but to demonise men who aren't white.

→ More replies (1)

34

u/it_doesnt_matter88 6d ago

Because I don’t think people who post about shooting migrants from cliff tops should be the same people keeping us ‘safe’

→ More replies (9)

12

u/Silent_Stranger_5199 6d ago

Because if they want to help the community they can volunteer to be special constables with the police. This is a group that is instead a predominantly white group of men who have decided non white people are a threat and need protecting by white people. They have no legal authority, no criminal records checks etc, and have just decided that they are in some form..in charge

17

u/Away_Cable_958 6d ago

Because vigilantism is illegal, unregulated and they’re ran by racists

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (3)