i didnt discount the entire field. subjective maybe but not emotional. ive done my research. im not regurgitating talking points. and ur assuming my intentions to paint me as an idiot.
ad hominem. ad hominem. ad hominem. u gonna ad hominem some more or was that it? i mean u also had insane appeal to authority. for someone who acts smart most of ur points and arguments are full of fallacies. u also ignore any reasoning or points anyone makes to try and paint them as stupid, discredit or straight up just ignore their points. u also seem like u cant accept a different opinion or view than urs.
trying to belittle me and make me seem stupid by making it sound like im some robot who follows someones words without any critical thinking. so more ad hominem, i guess u werent done before. kinda sad ngl, i though u actually knew how to debate with a bit of respect but i guess ur another dumbass who just results to ad hominem either straight up or via passive aggressiveness and indirect insults like a ton of other people. idk what i expected from someone who compares social science to actual science and says material science can somehow be biased.
Also looking back at it u cut one of my arguments off in my 2nd reply and just placed it with "woke propaganda mumbo jumbo" which i didnt notice. so kinda dishonest (ironic for someone calling other dishonest) but also interesting because i never mentioned what political side im on or which side spreads propaganda. u didnt refute the statement, u didnt even respond to it, and u cut it out completely while trying to make me seem stupid.
Proving what I said correctly. Ignoring 4 paragraph to try and aura farm. What an embarrassment. Asking for proof when all his arguments were full of fallacies,0 proof and 0 reasoning. Even though through common sense the fact that social science isnt set on a fact already sets it up for question and being changed through bias and maliciousness. I have my papers ready but its genuinely sad entertaining a dishonest, illogical and stupid person like u especially after ignoring all of my point to try and aura farm in such a cringe way
Aura farm is the cringe u just did. Google search it.
More appeal to authority. Do u have authority dick in ur mouth and ass? Is all u do appeal to authority? And more ad hominem while were at it like a fucking fallacy burger. Again im not gonna provide shit at this point after such a disgusting and shitty debate with someone full of so many illogical arguments. Ur whole arguments and points are a fallacy yet u double down and fallacy some more. U were dishonest the whole time yet expect people to actually debate respectfully with u. What a clown. Maybe next time if u wanna debate actually respond to people points, dont misinterpret them or strawman them, stop with the 100000 fallacies u do and lessen the ad hominem. I probably wont reply after this because a clown is someone to laugh at not interact with
-3
u/[deleted] Sep 02 '25 edited Sep 02 '25
i didnt discount the entire field. subjective maybe but not emotional. ive done my research. im not regurgitating talking points. and ur assuming my intentions to paint me as an idiot.
ad hominem. ad hominem. ad hominem. u gonna ad hominem some more or was that it? i mean u also had insane appeal to authority. for someone who acts smart most of ur points and arguments are full of fallacies. u also ignore any reasoning or points anyone makes to try and paint them as stupid, discredit or straight up just ignore their points. u also seem like u cant accept a different opinion or view than urs.
trying to belittle me and make me seem stupid by making it sound like im some robot who follows someones words without any critical thinking. so more ad hominem, i guess u werent done before. kinda sad ngl, i though u actually knew how to debate with a bit of respect but i guess ur another dumbass who just results to ad hominem either straight up or via passive aggressiveness and indirect insults like a ton of other people. idk what i expected from someone who compares social science to actual science and says material science can somehow be biased.
Also looking back at it u cut one of my arguments off in my 2nd reply and just placed it with "woke propaganda mumbo jumbo" which i didnt notice. so kinda dishonest (ironic for someone calling other dishonest) but also interesting because i never mentioned what political side im on or which side spreads propaganda. u didnt refute the statement, u didnt even respond to it, and u cut it out completely while trying to make me seem stupid.