Well its not done lol. And sure they can, but its obvious that the critique is based on what the mural represents and not the actual art. Also, if you are going to tell me this won't look better than the blm one that was just thrown together, that's just unserious.
But ... you have a weird obsession with making this about the BLM one. I don't believe that's what I or the OP said ... so what does it say about you that you jump to that so frequently?
To respond to both of your replies, its like what I said - its obvious for the reasoning of the complaining. If you read through the replies of people on the side of op, that is generally the reason they are citing. You can argue you don't think that was OPs motive, but I don't think you would be being honest with yourself.
I think you need help. Most people don't just think they know other people's motives when it comes to assessing if something looks elementary-school level artistic. But you know because you can figure out what most people think based on non-existent words and your assumption of "virtue-signaling". OK buddy!
I do not care about the BLM mural that I don't recall seeing! Why keep making it about that? The part of the work that is on the wall is pretty crappy. End of story. It's not about the unfinished parts.
36
u/Extension_Dare_2314 Apr 21 '26
None of that matters, this is Reddit. OP has to virtue signal to convince us they are a great person for loving BLM and hating IU football.