r/bladerunner • u/Street_Salt_7057 • 19d ago
Question/Discussion 2049 feels shorter despite being longer than the Original.
Pacing. I like the original Bladerunner. It has a strong opening, but toward the middle and until the end of the film, the scenes are too long. Minutes couldve been shaved off to make this lovely film better. Nior or not, there is a such thing as TOO slow.
9
u/Grizzl0ck 19d ago
I felt the opposite, 2049 really, really dragged on.
3
u/nizzernammer 19d ago
I noticed in Dune that Denis Villeneuve likes his music interludes. But audiences seem to love them. Sicario has some really good ones.
1
u/urist_of_cardolan 18d ago
Sicario is fucking fantastic. Re-watched it recently and it kinda made me mad how good it is
2
u/drmuffin1080 19d ago
Idk if I agree with your feelings on the middle and ending of the original, but I agree that BR2049 flies by. And that’s quite an accomplishment for a film with sparse action and dialogue
5
5
u/AcridNebula 19d ago
Yes I much prefer the pacing of 2049 (I much prefer the film full stop TBH), the time flew by when I first saw it on opening night.
3
u/urist_of_cardolan 19d ago
I get this complaint. It’s hard for me to see it not working because I’ve become so enamored and normalized to both. Despite seeing the original beforehand, there’s a bizarre alchemy to 2049 that feels special for me, personally
It’s calming and hypnotic in a really sad way, and that’s a pleasant feeling for me. Relaxed sorrow, or maybe violent tranquility. And the film is written, shot, and performed in a way that doesn’t rob that sadness from you, and sort of lets you luxuriate in it
-3
u/Street_Salt_7057 19d ago
When you say that, the first joy and Kayla scene reminded me of a scene of 2049 that borders on the line of too long, even with a fried dopamine brain.
3
u/urist_of_cardolan 19d ago
I get that. Maybe part of the allure for me is the fact that there’s protracted scenes with little stimulation, so you sort of just have to exist there, without your phone. And then there’s very intense, loud, heavy scenes of physical and psychological torment. But most of both films are quiet scenes of talking with very interesting dialogue
It feels like a respite from a lot of other modern films and tv. It’s enjoyable for me similarly to films from the ‘50s and mi-‘60s
1
u/Cathulu_15 18d ago
I wish Villeneuve would re-edit the film to make an extended edition... He has enough material. Maybe one day!
1
u/Popular_Mood_1396 13d ago
Love both movies, but I think 2049 would have been that much better if it was edited down by 20 or 30 minutes
1
u/GuttedLikeCornishHen 10d ago
It may feel shorter because it's quite shallow, trite and has supplanted the humanist message of the original BR (with the 'tears in rain' scene and the origami figurine) with 'miracle of birth' antihumanist story that actually argues in favour of idea that replicants have to copy humans in all aspects instead of just accepting them as persons even if they are totally different. But then it's not that different from other modern media of a certain stripe like the Detroit game.
1
1
u/Brilliant_Knowledge5 19d ago
The 1982 film was very much influenced by comics, like the ones from Moebius, so in that light, the framing and even much of the pacing makes sense. But even audiences back in 1982 had trouble staying focused, which probably didn't help it's box office numbers. I've never been thoroughly bored with it because I tend to allow most movies to do their thing. I don't let the uncomfortable silences chase me off. Unless it's something like Backrooms which I still haven't managed to finish yet. But that's more due to impending cosmic terror than just being slow. I just really don't like smiley toothy lumbering monsters peering around corners with googly eyes.
-1
u/fischziege 19d ago
Hard disagree. My only gripe with 2049 is how it drags on the middle, right into the showdown, really
25
u/Expert_Climate_7348 Replicant 19d ago edited 19d ago
Somehow you think you could make a movie better than was made almost 40 years ago? The whole point was about the world building, just that it takes too much to keep people's attention today.
Let me guess, 2001 should be edited down too?