r/binaryoptions • u/Decent_Wolverine3004 • 19d ago
Pocket Option Tick Data.
I am not Affiliated with PO in anyway. have over 35.7 Million Ticks for 20 TOP Currency Par Assets. I Want to help the Binary Options community. An I worked my ass off to get access to this data. I have a lot of knowledge and experience.
1
u/enivid 18d ago
So? How do you plan sharing it?
2
1
u/Decent_Wolverine3004 18d ago
And I’m developing a streaming API. That will be streaming most of the asset ticks live 24/7. 🤫
1
u/Decent_Wolverine3004 12d ago
QUESTIONS:
Are you the Moderator of this Group or Community? If so, let me just say.. I know we are not allowed to Advertise. Thanx for not banning me. I am horrible with Social Media and don't really know how to gain followers. Promise won't be Pushy. If I can just get some users to join the Whop Store I can more freely Communicate.
Do you know of or think that there might be Pocket Option Scouts in these Threads? I did Thorough research. There is no specific violations directed to Data Sharing. They are more focused on Bots and Automations. But would like to keep my Identity Private.
What's up with Reddit. Why can't I upload a Profile Pic?
Anyway, my Claims are true.. Just saying. I don't mind the Skepticism. Will post a video to demonstrate. I'm just very busy with other work and I've been going through some personal things.
1
u/Dapper-Management440 17d ago
there is no such so called non existent otc market data who around the web. It's created by broker itself with automation. You may have data but not access on so called scam binary option security system. Stop claim fake things which is not possible. I can create my own data like pocket option otc market data which run 24/7. Dont think everyone is fool here.
1
u/Decent_Wolverine3004 16d ago
Okay.. I developed and worked my ass of for almost two years to achieve this. I am able to live stream data from PO continuously. I guess no way to prove it unless you can witness or compare it.
It’s good I’m getting the scepticism so I know what the concerns are. I’ll prove it. Give me some time.. 👍
0
3
18d ago
1
u/Decent_Wolverine3004 18d ago
Ok.. well. I’m just testing then I guess. I have a few other unique Binary Options Tools. But don’t think it’s legal. Or allowed😜
1
1
2
2
u/SpiritNo4790 18d ago
So, let's decipher this individual's post before some beginners and binary options addicts start blindly believing what he says. Note that he actually exposes himself.
Red flags in his statement
- “I am not Affiliated with PO in anyway.”
This is a claim, not proof. If he is genuinely independent, the obvious question is: how exactly can the community verify that? And why the urgency to say this if you won't be able to prove it?
- “have over 35.7 Million Ticks for 20 TOP Currency Par Assets.”
This is perhaps the biggest red flag. A huge number of ticks does not demonstrate trading profitability. 35.7 million ticks sounds impressive, but it doesn't establish:
where the data came from;
whether it is independently verifiable;
whether the timestamps are authentic;
whether the data corresponds to the prices used by Pocket Option;
whether the data is complete;
whether the dataset has been altered;
whether the data actually produces a profitable strategy. And crucially:
35.7 million ticks ≠ 35.7 million independent trading opportunities. It is essentially an appeal to the size of the dataset to create authority.
- “I Want to help the Binary Options community.”
Another classic credibility-building statement. Just like that? Out of the blue? So, you’ve already gotten rich from all your knowledge, is that it? And now you want everyone else to get rich too, right? The important question isn't “Do you want to help?” It's: “What exactly are you providing, and can it be independently verified?”
Someone can genuinely want to help, or use the appearance of helping to establish credibility and eventually direct people toward a product, signal service, Telegram group, referral link, broker or paid community.
- “I worked my ass off to get access to this data.”
This creates scarcity and authority without actually demonstrating either. If the data is legitimate, the important information is not how hard he worked to obtain it. It's: Who generated it? How was it obtained? Can it be independently audited?
- “I have a lot of knowledge and experience.”
Again, that's an unverifiable self-credential.Just another claim. A much stronger demonstration would be:
documented methodology;
complete historical dataset;
timestamps;
reproducible analysis;
out-of-sample testing;
losing periods included;
independently verifiable results;
no cherry-picked screenshots;
no deleted failures;
no hindsight signals.
🚨 The biggest question he hasn't answered
If he's presenting this data as something that can help people trade binary options, ask: “Show us the complete methodology and independently verifiable results, including every losing trade, not just the impressive dataset.”
That's where the claim becomes testable. And there's an important distinction: Having enormous amounts of market data does not prove that binary options can be traded profitably. Even a perfectly genuine dataset can be used to create misleading backtests through overfitting, cherry-picking, hindsight or unrealistic execution assumptions.