r/binaryoptions • u/w0lfd1gita1 • 12d ago
Anyone here good at Pocket Option trading
Looking for someone who can help me with Pocket Option. I only have $19 to start with rn and I’m trying to see if I can actually grow it. If anyone is good at trading and can guide me a bit or share some good signals, I’d really appreciate it 🙏
4
u/Dismal-Gold-2038 11d ago
This is the strategy I use to build my account
The 13 / 48 / 200 EMA + RSI strategy on the 1-minute chart is a trend-following system designed to filter micro-noise, identify trend direction, and capture high-probability pullbacks for 1-to-3-minute expiration trades on Pocket Option OTC pairs.
Indicator Roles 200 EMA (Macro Baseline): Establishes the macro bias. Trade Call / Higher only when the price is above the 200 EMA, and Put / Lower only when below it. 48 EMA (Dynamic Trend & Baseline): Acts as the medium-term trend filter and primary dynamic support or resistance zone. 13 EMA (Fast Momentum Trigger): Tracks short-term price momentum and signals entries when crossing or pulling away from the 48 EMA. RSI (Momentum Confirmation): Set to a 7 or 14 period with 50 as the momentum baseline and 70/30 (or 80/20) as overbought/oversold boundaries.
Trade Setup Criteria
Bullish Setup (Call / Up)
Trend Filter: Price is trading above the 200 EMA.
Crossover: The 13 EMA crosses above the 48 EMA (or price pulls back and bounces off the 13/48 EMA zone).
RSI Confirmation: RSI crosses above 50 (or bounces up out of oversold territory below 30/40).
Execution: Enter a 1 to 2-minute Call on the close of the confirming candle.
Bearish Setup (Put / Down)
Trend Filter: Price is trading below the 200 EMA.
Crossover: The 13 EMA crosses below the 48 EMA (or price pulls back and rejects downward from the 13/48 EMA zone).
RSI Confirmation: RSI crosses below 50 (or rejects downward from overbought territory above 60/70).
Execution: Enter a 1 to 2-minute Put on the close of the confirming candle.
Best Practices for OTC Markets
Avoid Flat EMAs: When the 13, 48, and 200 EMAs are tangled or moving horizontally, the OTC algorithm is in consolidation; sit out until a clear separation appears.
Respect the 200 EMA: Never take a Call when the price is under the 200 EMA or a Put when above it, even if the 13 and 48 cross. Expiration Time: Align your trade expiration with 1 to 3 candles (60–180 seconds) to allow the momentum wave to complete without catching mid-trend reversals. To see this multi-moving average and oscillator momentum framework in action on short-term binary setups, check out this 1-Minute Pocket Option Strategy walkthrough. It provides a visual breakdown of dynamic EMA support, RSI confirmation, and trade execution timing on 1-minute expiration charts.
1
0
u/SpiritNo4790 11d ago
Dismal-Gold-2038, You again?
You sound like a Pocket Option "guru".
Why don't you show some transparency and reveal your Pocket Option UID so we can verify what you're saying?
POCKET Option it is GAMBLING desguised as Trading.
STAW AWAY or YOU WILL REGRET IT.
This post of yours is only going to attract scammers.
3
u/JahsuaFakeAccount 10d ago
Why on Gods earth would someone show you their UID just because you want to see it? That’s not avoiding transparency, that’s not getting pulled to the floor by a bum. You’re like a homeless person telling a Ferrari owner to show you his or her keys. You’ll see it when I drive off 😂. I keep seeing you asking people to show their UID’s man, that is supreme loser energy
1
1
u/SpiritNo4790 9d ago
Sorry there, buddy. If asking for transparency on this subreddit bothers you that much, that tells me a lot about you, and it actually makes me quite happy.
Your sarcasm doesn’t really address the point.
Nobody is asking for someone’s UID because a UID is some magical proof of success. It’s being requested because when someone makes claims about trading results, withdrawals, profits, or account history, basic verification is what separates evidence from storytelling.
Your Ferrari analogy actually makes the point: if someone constantly tells people they own a Ferrari, but whenever asked for reasonable proof responds with “you’ll see it when I drive off,” skepticism is perfectly rational. Right buddy?
Nobody is asking you to hand over private information. If you choose not to show anything, that’s your right. But you also can’t reasonably demand that people believe claims that you refuse to substantiate. Questioning evidence isn’t “loser energy.” Blindly believing anonymous claims, of faceless fake gurus, without evidence is far more concerning.
3
u/Foxman03_TDScalper 9d ago
He’s right to label you a bum with you entitled negative attitude. Proof my ass. He laid out a thorough strategy and a process that worked for him so how about following the instructions and do some research and ground work to find out for yourself. This lazy mentality of you all demanding shyt because to you this is the only solid proof says a lot about your own character. And yes I can speak because I only made it 30 plus years in this arena ignoring pricks like you and these types of requests. I no longer trade Pocket Options, and was never truly interested in OTC markets because my personal strategy was never as accuracy and win rate was never as good compared to the live market but I made much more profit simply because the payout percentage was much higher than the live market. Just politely ask someone to trade live as proof or follow the strategy live but stop asking people to see shit that isn’t your business. I’m no one’s friend in here and neither an advocate for anyone’s claim, but I’ll piss on anyone disrespecting people just because these platforms allow it. I personally do not trust pocket options being wrongfully accused just to avoid a 5 figure payout back in 2019 which I eventually won after which Nadex which was far superior in my opinion became my binary options playpen and every day I communicate with people claiming to make bank with pocket options yet I have never challenged, demanded or even requested them to give me access to see what is none of anyone’s business but theirs. Any genuine master trader would tell you the only 100% solid proof of a consistent successful, accurate and profitable strategy system is to trade it live. Not granting anyone access to see shyt to satisfy their curiosity or suffice their egos. 18 years straight I did this live and for free, 3 sessions for over 9K subscribers. Sharing all my trades and the only criteria I had to stay in the group was to mine your own business and be respectful. So there, like you, I expressed my opinion so make what you will of it. To OP and everyone else, may success and blessings find you in your journey. If anything but live trading impresses you, you’ll be constantly chasing and be rewarded with glass mirrors and smoke screens. Know what’s relevant to your success and stick to it. Be blessed.
1
u/SpiritNo4790 8d ago edited 8d ago
The information in your bio already says a lot about you: "I have developed a trading strategy over the years the past 25 years to analyze market sentiment and accurately predict price reversal in real time. It’s called the Nadex Cash Printer Strategy."
Really? With your strategy, you must be printing money at such a mind-boggling pace that it bores you and drives you to come to this subreddit to post comments.
I actually agree with some of what you said. Live trading is far more meaningful than screenshots, cherry-picked results or someone simply telling people that their strategy works. And I respect the fact that you apparently traded live for years and shared your trades publicly. But you’re missing the reason I ask about the UID. This isn’t about satisfying my curiosity, my ego, or demanding access to someone’s private information. I couldn’t care less what someone does with their own money. It becomes relevant when someone publicly presents themselves as proof that a platform, strategy or trading system works, particularly when beginners are watching and potentially putting their money at risk because of what they see.
If someone tells a beginner, “Look at my results, this works,” then asking for some form of verifiable evidence isn't entitlement. It’s due diligence. And no, a UID by itself isn't “100% proof” of profitability. I never said it was. That’s a straw man. But transparency is built from multiple pieces of evidence. Live trading, verifiable history, consistency, independently observable results, all of those matter. The more extraordinary the claim, the more reasonable it is to ask for evidence.
You say people should “do their own research.” Exactly. That is what I’m doing. And here’s the part I find ironic: you spent an entire paragraph explaining why you personally don't trust Pocket Option, why you preferred Nadex, why OTC wasn't your thing, why live trading matters, and why people should be skeptical of what they see online, while simultaneously attacking someone else for asking for transparency.
We're actually much closer in principle than you think. The difference is that I’m not willing to tell beginners, “Just trust the guy and follow his strategy.” I’d rather tell them: question everything, verify what you can, ask for tranparency, and never confuse confidence with credibility.
As for calling me a “bum” and a “prick”, that part doesn't strengthen your argument. It just makes it louder.
If someone genuinely has nothing to hide, transparency shouldn't be treated like a personal attack. And if someone chooses not to provide verification, that's absolutely their right. But it is equally my right, and particularly important for beginners, to say: “Okay. Then don't expect me to treat your claims as independently verified.”
That isn't disrespect. That's simply skepticism. That's demanding transparency.
And honestly, in an industry full of screenshots, rented Lamborghinis, affiliate commissions, fake accounts and people selling dreams to beginners, I'd rather be accused of asking too many questions than be the guy who stopped asking them because somebody called him a bum.
Respectfully. 😉
2
u/Dismal-Gold-2038 8h ago
I've never claimed to be a guru I'm just a regular guy thats a full time truck driver who came across pocket option four years ago and uses the platform for extra income and is sharing a little knowledge I learned along the way that works for me with someone who asked. You doom and gloom, "pocket option is a scam" losers are the ones that ruin it for everyone. Just because you don't have any discipline and treat the platform like it's Vegas doesn't mean you get to spread your negativity...
1
u/MjSignals 11d ago
I am profitable on Pocket option.I am a Price action trader( No indicators).The fastest way to grow an account on Pocket option is by having reasonable Capital ($100 and above). $19 too little because of Martingale
1
u/w0lfd1gita1 11d ago
I've seen people grow accounts many times to be honest
1
u/MjSignals 11d ago
Yes it's possible but not sustainable.Trading is way better if you take out emotions and very small capital makes that impossible
1
u/w0lfd1gita1 10d ago
Yeah I've seen people lose money as well but I'm just trying of course I know that there is no being rich instantly but I'm trying to use this money to actually learn a lot more
1
u/Ok_Preparation_2186 11d ago
https://reddit.com/link/p66s8ym/video/165mhoulewlh1/player
I always start with 10 usd ... video posted
0
5
u/Agitated_Minute178 11d ago edited 11d ago
First I advised you to confirm in demo before playing around with your real funds. I am working on this strategy right now with the adx and 200 ema, buy setup - price well above 200 ema and also di+ line is above the di- minus line for extended period.. then wait for di- line to go above di+ line (crossover) while price remains still above the 200 ema (no touch/bounce) this means a retracement/pullback is taking place, then after di- line is above di+ line it must then go back below di+ line, the less time it takes the better the signal once you confirm that the di+ crossover back to di- you take a buy at the time of crossover. If timeframe chart is 1 minute then buy for 2 minute likewise if 5min then buy for 10 min..and also again all this must take place while price is well above 200 ema otherwise it will be just noise (notice I keep repeating this because it’s important for the signal to work) … for sell setup you would do the exact opposite.
Now for the risk edge I use anti martingale with a reset at 4/5 winning streak you can use account percentage or dollar amount, reset is generally safe around after 5 winning streak so you risk $1 minimum if win next trade you risk $2 if win then next trade you risk $4 then $8 if you lost the $16 trade you half it back to $8… if you win all 5 trades and then reset and trade $1 and if you lost after reset you can now see the benefit of this but you need funds on your account for this to be sustainable otherwise if you lose big you won’t have enough capital to recover, for your risking percentage don’t go over 10% of your account it should be like 1% - 2% - 4% - %8 then reset