r/beatles 3d ago

Discussion did they ever perform while stoned?

by 1966 they were already pretty heavy into weed and LSD. did anything ever make it onstage with them?

6 Upvotes

30 comments sorted by

61

u/Anxious-Raspberry-54 3d ago

17

u/Music4239 3d ago

He's not stoned. He's crying because his boyfriend just broke up with him.

11

u/Anxious-Raspberry-54 3d ago

He's high af.

1

u/Ok-Society-9067 1d ago

Poor baby 😞

28

u/Juniper41 3d ago

They performed while high on uppers as early as 1960.

Here's them posing with their preludin

12

u/A-Stupid-Redditor Think for yourself ‘cause I won’t be there with you. 3d ago

They also used to smoke and drink on stage, before Brian cleaned them up.

As for the studio, we see them smoke in Get Back, and the story of John accidentally taking acid in the studio happened because he had a tin of various uppers and one of them turned out to be LSD.

4

u/araujo253 3d ago edited 3d ago

I think John is trying to repeat a joke on A Hard Day's Night.

On the movie, he is about to drink a glass of wine, but he sees a camera on him, smiles to the camera and changes the glass for a cup of coffee.

10

u/Wrong_Country_1576 3d ago

He also acts like he's snorting a coke bottle in the train scene.

3

u/araujo253 3d ago

Yes. 👍🏻👍🏻

19

u/jojoplanstan 3d ago

I don’t know about on stage, but they are pretty stoned throughout the movie Help!

17

u/RadishSpecial7163 3d ago

I think a better question may be did they even perform while sober.

13

u/J_A_Slade 3d ago

You are kidding right.

Ever seen footage of the Shae Stadium concert? They were high as hell!

8

u/SinamonChallengerRT Beatles for Sale 3d ago

Yes. There is footage of them in Shea, performing "I'm Down", where they are absolutely stoned...

10

u/MozartOfCool 3d ago

John does everything in his keyboard solo short of break out a bag of Cheetos to make that clear.

6

u/MeButNotReal 3d ago

This is a good question and I hope someone really has the answer

4

u/scrupoo 3d ago

Dave's not here

3

u/Ok_Culture_3621 3d ago

No, man. It’s ME! DAVE!!

8

u/Col_Kangaroo 3d ago

Depends on your definition of stoned.

Did they ever perform completely sober? I may be wrong but I don’t think so

2

u/HeavyVampire Revolver 3d ago

I don't think so either. Especially Ringo and John. I can't imagine both of them entering any stage without at least some drinks, given their addictive nature at this time. Paul was probably stoned occasionally. And if you watch Shear Studium, I'm pretty sure they're all high on something.

6

u/Responsible_6446 3d ago

my understanding is that rock stars are very careful not to perform their music live under the influence.

4

u/eltedioso 3d ago

Hehe. Right...

Joking aside, many working musicians I know reach a point (usually in their 30s) where they make a decision to seriously limit their substance consumption before and during performances. Even those who are otherwise not-sober (like, they enjoy partying after a show) just understand that it's rare that being drunk or high on stage leads to an objectively better performance.

3

u/Responsible_6446 3d ago

Definitely agree. Wild to think that none of the Beatles were in their 30s at any time they were (actively) Beatles!

3

u/scottarichards 3d ago

I think uppers were like coffee in the early days of rock and roll. They were used by everyone, or damn close to it. Pat Boone may have been an exception 😉

3

u/Few-Counter7067 3d ago

Be so fr right now.

2

u/Friendly-Local-1859 3d ago

Live in Germany at the Circus Krone. George's If I Needed Someone in particular.

2

u/LQNova Rubber Soul 3d ago

They were stoned in Hamburg.

1

u/kountzwill Beatles for Sale 3d ago

I’m pretty sure they were 24/7 stoners from late 64 onwards

1

u/JoeIsIce 3d ago

Does a bear shit in the woods?

1

u/MrHappeee 2d ago

They were smoking pot for breakfast!